A Day for Emancipation

Jeanette E. Sherbondy • October 26, 2021


In 2013 Governor Martin O’Malley declared November 1 the official Emancipation Day for Maryland. It was a long time coming because the day it celebrates was in 1864, 249 years earlier, when Maryland’s new constitution went into effect.

 

Enslaved people in Maryland had been exempted from the Emancipation Proclamation that President Abraham Lincoln announced on January 1, 1863, as it affected only those enslaved in the states in rebellion. But Maryland, on its own, emancipated its enslaved people before the Civil War ended and before Congress passed the 13th Amendment on February 1, 1865.

 

Some enslaved Black Americans had not waited for either President Lincoln or the Maryland legislature or the United States Congress. They began emancipating themselves by running away. From 1800 on, many of those who were enslaved became free and many fled the state. Among those who escaped from the Eastern Shore were Henry Highland Garnet, Frederick Douglass, and Harriet Tubman.

 

In 1824 Garnet escaped with his family from a farm in Kent County. Their owner gave them permission to attend a funeral. The family boarded a wagon and set off. But they did not go to the funeral — they headed to Wilmington, Del., instead. Part of the family went on to New Jersey, but Henry’s immediate family — his father, mother, and sister — continued to Pennsylvania where they stayed for a short time. His father, George, recognized that this was a turning point for the family. He called them together and gave them new names. His mother’s priority was to get an education for her children so she started teaching them. Then the family decided to move on to New York City for more safety.

 

Henry acquired an education and was ordained a minister in the Presbyterian Church. He was a forceful speaker, who spoke out for liberty of the enslaved. He encouraged them to do whatever was necessary to free themselves, whether to return to Africa as colonists or to fight for their freedom in America. In an address to the National Negro Convention of 1843 in Buffalo, New York, he charged the enslaved with acting to free themselves:

 

“Neither God, nor angels, or just men, command you to suffer for a single moment. Therefore it is your solemn and imperative duty to use every means, moral, intellectual, and physical, that promises success.

 

“Remember that you are FOUR MILLIONS! Let your motto be RESISTANCE! No oppressed people have ever secured their liberty without resistance.”

 

In 1838 Frederick Douglass left Talbot County where he had been born. When he was 12 years old his enslavers sent him to serve a member of their family in Baltimore. The wife taught him the alphabet, even though her husband was against literacy for the enslaved. Frederick found ways to educate himself, learning to read and write as he worked on the docks. He was lent to another enslaver who whipped him frequently, so when he was 16 he decided to run away. He was in love with a free Black woman, Anna Murray, who encouraged him and helped him escape. In 1838 he got on a train for the north. He disguised himself as a sailor with a uniform Anna provided him and he, too, like Henry Highland Garnet, went to Wilmington, to Philadelphia, and then to New York City.

 

Douglass was a leader in the abolitionist movement, an orator, a writer, and statesman. Some of his words:

 

“Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down.”

 

“There is no negro problem. The problem is whether the American people have loyalty enough, honor enough, patriotism enough, to live up to their own constitution.”

 

“The thing worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion.”

 

Harriet Tubman escaped from her enslaver in Dorchester County in 1849 when he tried to sell her. She had a husband, but she was determined to flee. She left with her two brothers. Her brothers turned back and then she did also, but she escaped again a short time later without her brothers. She sang “I’m bound for the promised land” as a code to indicate she was leaving. She was guided by the Underground Railroad, an informal network of trusted contacts who helped enslaved people escape. She arrived in Pennsylvania and felt relief.

 

Later she returned many times to Dorchester County to help others get away, including members of her family. In 1851 she stopped at the home of Frederick Douglass in Philadelphia with several other fugitives. In all, she rescued about 70 enslaved people in 13 different trips.

 

All three escapees continued to help others find freedom. None of them wanted to escape by violence, but Garnet realized that violence was inevitable. Violence came in the form of the Civil War that broke out in 1861. Maryland was not part of the rebellious states, but had soldiers who fought for both sides. Over 8,700 African American men from Maryland fought for the United States. In 1863 the Bureau of Colored Troops was established by the U.S. War Department for the recruitment of African American soldiers. Those troops

 served in 175 regiments in infantry, cavalry, engineering, light artillery, and heavy artillery units. The United States Colored Troops was disbanded in 1865. They were succeeded by the Buffalo Soldier regiments in the West.

 

Among those who joined the USCT were the sons of Frederick Douglass. Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass, and Henry Highland Garnet participated in the war effort in other ways. Garnet was a chaplain to the soldiers. Tubman was a spy, armed scout, cook, and nurse for the U.S. She led an armed expedition in the raid at Combahee Ferry, S.C., which liberated more than 700 enslaved people. Douglass published in newspapers and served as a recruiter for the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment. 

 

A study of the Black veterans from just Kent County reveals that at least 471 out of a total of 3,124 Black males in Kent County fought in the Colored Troops and in the Navy. That was 16% of the total African American male population in Kent County, and 5% of the population of Maryland. More than half were free Blacks (1,839) and the rest were enslaved (3,124).

 

The long-ignored remembrance of Maryland’s emancipation was revived by Governor O’Malley, who declared the first Maryland Emancipation Day for November 1, 2013.

 

Montgomery Council President Katz declared last year:

 

“On Nov. 1, 1864, Maryland legally freed all those held in bondage within its boundaries through a new state constitution. Sadly, more than a century and a half later, we still see the long shadow that slavery cast over our nation, the deep divides that it sowed, and the injustices that it created. On Maryland Emancipation Day, we reflect on our history and recommit ourselves to dismantling institutional and systemic racism.”

 


Sources:

“An Address To The Slaves Of The United States, 1843,” Henry Highland Garnet, BlackPast.

https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1843-henry-highland-garnet-address-slaves-united-states/

 

George R. Shivers, “A Study of African American Soldiers from Kent County, Maryland in the American Civil War, 2017”

 

“County, State Leaders Declare Emancipation Day,” Source of the Spring Staff, Nov. 1, 2020.

https://www.sourceofthespring.com/montgomery-county-news/county-state-leaders-declare-emancipation-day/

 

 

Jeanette E. Sherbondy is a retired anthropology professor from Washington College and has lived here since 1986. In retirement she has been active with the Kent County Historical Society and Sumner Hall, one of the organizers of Legacy Day, and helped get highway /historical markers recognizing Henry Highland Garnet. She published an article on her ethnohistorical research of the free Black village, Morgnec.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More