A Waterman Speaks His Mind

Mike Johnson, waterman • September 27, 2017

This is a subtitle for your new post

For over 40 years I enjoyed the curious experience of being both a liberal and a waterman on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. No matter which end of my social spectrum I explored, conflict was easy to find. From telling turtle trappers that I wouldn’t buy their small snapping turtle even though it was of legal size, to arguing against reduction of harvest as the go-to tool for “fixing” the Chesapeake with environmentalists. I’ve been in plenty of debates, and I’d like to print a waterman’s perspective, in the hope of incubating some understanding.

The boom and bust nature of the industry, the need to work in all types of weather, repetitive motion and other factors probably ensures a high percentage of addiction issues and unsavory personalities in the ranks. That doesn’t justify the negative opinion and treatment members of the seafood industry can count on from Maryland Democrats. For every greedy, uncaring over harvester I can introduce you to 3 watermen that fully realize their bounty is finite, and nurture and glean is the order of the day.

The truth is many of the arrests you read about for illegal harvesting are the result of watermen tipping off the DNR and turning the cheaters in. Yet in Maryland watermen have been subjected to a bias and prejudice we would never allow to be applied to any religious or racial group.

When pollution from run off created conditions made reproduction all but impossible for rockfish, little was done to address the actual problem, while watermen were forced to endure a complete moratorium on the foundation of their paycheck. Diseases like pfisteria, Vibrio vulnificus , MSX, and Perkinsus marinus - all with characteristics you’d find in a sci-fi novel - wreak havoc in the bay, and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) insist reduction of harvest by commercial fishermen is the solution, over and over again.

When dermo and MSX devastated the bay’s oyster population in the 80’s it was the watermen that devised a plan to harvest fossilized shell from the upper bay, carry them down the bay where spat set was high but survival rate low, then scoop them up and carry them to less saline water where they were more likely to survive. All this paid for with a self-imposed surcharge on every bushel of oysters sold. It worked, but Paris Glendening and his henchman John Griffin sabotaged the program by failing to apply for the permit needed from US Army Corps of Engineers.

When forced to apply for the permit via lawsuit, the DNR recommended against on the grounds the dredging caused “turbidity.” This precipitated the collapse of the oyster population we still suffer today.

Once again watermen had a progressive idea: power dredge the oyster bars lifting the shell out of the silt, increasing the chances of successful spat set. This was met by extreme opposition from both CBF and the DNR and only a tiny percentage of historical oyster bottom allows this practice. Despite that, it is responsible for most of the oysters harvested in Maryland over the past several years.

Since the first license was required, Maryland’s Commercial fishermen have only asked for a fair share of the Chesapeake Bay’s bounty. The same cannot be said for the sport fishing or aquaculture industries. During the O’Malley era, again with John Griffin’s vindictive architecture, almost all the upper bay’s historic oyster bottom was made sanctuary, closed to commercial activity in the hopes of replacing wild harvest with aquaculture.

Currently the MWA would like a small portion of the upper bay to try a rotational plan where they would close an area, prepare bottom, plant spat, allow the oysters to grow, then open it to harvest by watermen. The MWA’s position is how can it hurt to try and see what works best?

The DNR and the environmental community are not so open minded. The upper bay remains sanctuary despite a complete lack of evidence that it is giving the bay what it needs: Thriving oyster bars.

If we are ever to return to the day when the Speaker of the House of Delegates is from the Eastern Shore or the representative to the US Congress from the 1st district of Maryland is a democrat, or even a reasonable human being, we must respect the historic residents of our beautiful bucolic island.

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More