Blog Post

Eastern Shore Data Briefs: Three Employment Measures

Jan Plotczyk • May 09, 2023


Our last data brief talked about some demographic measures in Eastern Shore counties. This time we’ll explore a few employment measures.

 

These data are from the American Community Survey (ACS), a program of the U.S. Census Bureau. ACS replaced the decennial census long form in 2010. ACS asks questions of a representative, randomized sample of about three-and-a-half million residents of the United States to produce yearly estimates of detailed social, demographic, housing, and economic information.

 

The estimates in the tables below are from ACS 2016-2020. The five-year estimates enable data from smaller jurisdictions — such as Eastern Shore counties — to be released; the ACS is often the only source of these data for rural and small communities.

 

Questionnaires for ACS are completed over a 12-month period, so respondents report their data at different times during the year. While this aspect of the survey does not usually have an effect on the data collected, it can affect employment data. Employment status is reported as of a “reference week,” that is, the calendar week prior to the date the respondent completed the questionnaire. This methodology accounts for the differences in unemployment rates as calculated by ACS and those reported by the state, which are calculated monthly using employment status as of the 12th of the month.

 


Mean travel time to work is the average travel time that workers took to get from home to work (one way) during the reference week. Work from home is not included. Travel can be by any mode. Travel time includes time spent waiting for public transportation, picking up passengers and carpools, and time spent in other activities related to getting to work.

 

According to ACS, average travel time to work has increased in the U.S. almost every year since 2006 (when it was 25 mins); the mean in 2019 was 28 minutes.

 

It should be no surprise that Queen Anne’s County residents have the longest average commute, as a significant portion of the working population travels across the Bay Bridge to the western shore for work. Travel time for these commuters would include any time waiting in a bridge backup. Please note: the ACS question asks for the time going TO work; if the question were FROM work, Queen Anne’s average travel time would be even longer, as east bound bridge delays are more frequent and longer than west bound.

 

In the U.S., between 2019 and 2021, the percentage of people primarily working from home tripled from 6% (roughly 9 million people) to 18% (27 million people), according to new 2021 ACS 1-year estimates. Maryland was one of four states with the highest percentage of home-based workers, all about 25% (DC was highest at 48%).

 

Those of us who live here have first-hand knowledge that this trend existed in the Eastern Shore counties as well; next year’s 5-year ACS estimates will no doubt reflect that.

 


Median household income is an annual measure. This chart shows income as measured in 2020 inflation-adjusted dollars.

 

Household income includes more than just earnings — that is, wage, salary, and self-employment income. Additional categories of income include interest, dividends, or net rental income; Social Security income; Supplemental Security income (SSI); public assistance income; retirement income; and any other income that doesn’t fit these listed categories.

 

Queen Anne’s County has the highest median household income on the Eastern Shore, no doubt reflecting the higher salaries paid on the western shore to its many bridge commuters. Cecil County is second highest; the county’s easy access to I-95 and thus to metropolitan areas to the north and south account for this. Somerset County, the most isolated county, has a median household income less than half of Queen Anne’s.

 

Maryland’s median household income in 2020 was $87,063 (surpassed by Queen Anne’s by over $9000). The median household income for the U.S. was $71,186 (surpassed by three Shore counties).

 

Median household income is substantially lower in rural areas than in urban areas, although often a lower cost of living mitigates this deficit. Nationally, since 2007, rural median income has averaged 25% below the urban median.

 

Not all Shore counties are considered rural, however. Five Shore counties were reclassified as metro/urban when they were incorporated into Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) by the federal government in 2013: Cecil (part of the Philadelphia MSA); Queen Anne’s (part of the Baltimore MSA); and Wicomico, Worcester, and Somerset (part of the Salisbury MSA). If you’ve ever driven in Somerset County you may disagree with this urban characterization.

 

The other four Shore counties — Caroline, Dorchester, Kent, and Talbot — are still considered rural, not persistent poverty counties. More on that next time.

 


Unemployment rates on the Shore varied as estimated by the ACS 2016-2020, from a low of 2.9% in Talbot County to 9.2% in Somerset. Maryland’s unemployment rate was 5.2% for the same period; the U.S. rate was 5.4%.

 

Unemployment rate is calculated much as you would expect, including all civilians 16 years and older, unless their work activity consisted of only work around the house or unpaid volunteer work, or unless they were institutionalized.

 

A person is considered employed if they were at work during the reference week, or were temporarily absent from their job.

 

A person is considered unemployed if they were neither at work nor temporarily absent, and were actively looking for work, and were available to start a job. (Anyone not satisfying all three criteria is not considered unemployed.)

 

The unemployment rate is calculated as the number of unemployed people divided by the civilian labor force (employed + unemployed).

 

ACS is based on a sample, rather than all people and households, so the rates and quantities reported are calculated estimates, not actual values. This means that there is a degree of uncertainty associated with them, known as sampling error. In general, the larger the sample, the smaller the level of sampling error. The Census Bureau calculates a margin of error (MOE) for each estimate; this provides a range of values within which the actual, “real-world” value is likely to fall.

 

This chart shows the estimates from the chart above, plus the range of values calculated using the margin of error.

 


In other words, while the published unemployment rate estimate for Talbot County is 2.9%, there is a calculated margin of error equal to ±0.9%, meaning that the actual unemployment rate in Talbot will fall somewhere between 2.0% and 3.8%. Notice that the margin of error is very low in Maryland and the U.S. because the number of respondents is higher. The margin of error increases as the size of the sample decreases; Somerset County had a small sample, thus the ±2.6% margin of error. (See Appendix Table for margin of error values.)

 

That’s it for this edition of Eastern Shore Data Briefs. Next time we’ll take a look at some community characteristics of Eastern Shore counties.

 


Appendix: Table of unemployment rate estimates and margins of error, American Community Survey, 2016-2020:

 



Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.



School Board Voter Guide graphic, LNN
By Local News Network 29 Oct, 2024
Who is running for school board in your district? With schools in Maryland facing issues ranging from the Blueprint for Maryland's Future to classroom cellphone use, voters will go to the polls Nov. 5 to vote for their local Board of Education. For that reason, the Local News Network at the University of Maryland's Philip Merrill College of Journalism sent a questionnaire to all 109 school board candidates to get their views on important issues. The results are compiled below. Read the Local News Network's stories about the issues in Maryland's school board races.
School board election sign
By Adam Hudacek, Capital News Service 29 Oct, 2024
There's a little-known conservative power player in the nation’s school board elections, and it has endorsed more candidates in Maryland than in any other state. The 1776 Project PAC, which says on its website that it supports “reform-minded conservatives who oppose political indoctrination and believe in parental rights,” has endorsed 19 Maryland school board candidates in nine of the state’s 24 school districts. The endorsements come as the state’s Democratic Party announces strategic targeting of 24 “extreme” conservative candidates. 
School supplies and tennis shoes
By Jim Block 29 Oct, 2024
The present general decline in American education was underway well before the covid pandemic, and surely, the pandemic worsened school outcomes. The harm done to students will not fade for some time. Those circumstances, one might think, call for debate and discussion in the 2024 general election. In previous presidential elections, education has been an important question. Candidates have made public school support major planks in their platforms. George H.W. Bush wanted to be the “education president.” And to improve reading readiness, to increase high-school graduation rates, and to put the U.S. in first place in math and science. Bill Clinton also wanted to increase school readiness and to set high goals for American schools. President George W. Bush eventually introduced the concept of “no child left behind” and wanted accountability enforced by increased testing. Barack Obama’s education policy wanted schools to “race to the top” by offering money to schools for innovation and reform. All of these efforts produced few, if any, results. There’s more bad news: The 2024 presidential candidates have had little to say about education. Donald Trump has vowed to abolish the Department of Education, but not said much beyond that. The United States’ educational needs did not appear in the Harris-Trump debate. In the vice presidential debate, Walz and Vance spoke of school safety, but not much else. The Democratic Party platform does argue for universal pre-school and for reducing absenteeism. It argues against schemes that divert public school funds, such as vouchers and tuition-tax credits. Harris and her party do support increased funding for career and technology education, believing that a four-year college education is not the only path for young people to succeed and to contribute to the economy. Angela Alsobrooks, currently Prince George’s county executive and candidate for Maryland senator, may have, as a local government official, immediate connection with educational needs and problems. One of her efforts created a public-private partnership to build new and rebuild old schools. This first-in-the-nation program, according to one report , builds schools much faster and more inexpensively than in the ordinary way. She also allocated $15 million for a career and technical education center in Temple Hills, Md. However important buildings and facilities may be, most in the education industry know that research shows what is most important in education: teacher quality . Excellent teachers may well be drawn by high pay. According to the Alsobrooks campaign website , she “funded the largest salary increase in a generation for all Prince Georges County school system employees.” Common Sense readers will not be surprised to read that the two major teacher unions (National Education Association and American Federation of Teachers) have endorsed Harris and Alsobrooks. But teachers who follow education in the national press may be surprised and perhaps disappointed that the media has not much looked into an important national issue, let alone an educational one: outside efforts to control curriculum content. A September National Public Radio report tells of school book bans and bans on divisive concepts: “Between July and December 2023, PEN America recorded more than 4,300 instances of school book bans, a big uptick from the previous year.” The book banners tried to replace those people in the schools, the teachers and administrators, who have the training and experience to choose reading and other curricular material. Assuming that one of the major purposes of schools is to prepare students for citizenship in a democracy, then what is taught and how it is taught counts for a great deal. However one might sympathize with parents’ desire to oversee their children’s education, censorship, or perhaps less powerful control over curriculum content, amounts to government censorship of free speech. When that constitutional right is violated in schools, children, more knowledgeable than many adults will grant, will face a contradiction. On one hand, they know that they and the press have freedom of speech. On the other, their schools prohibit the freedom of speech and the press. In her speech to the AFT, Harris said, “While you teach students about our nation’s past,” she told the crowd of teachers , “these extremists attack the freedom to learn and acknowledge our nation’s true and full history, including book bans.” As one might expect of two Democrats, their positions on education are similar. The public schools may not be as prominent a campaign issue as the economy, employment, or immigration, but surely the education of young citizens plays a great role in the nation’s economy, employment, and democratic government. Jim Block taught English at Northfield Mount Hermon, a boarding school in Western Mass. He coached cross-country and advised the newspaper and the debate society there. He taught at Marlborough College in England and Robert College in Istanbul. He and his wife retired to Chestertown, Md., in 2014. 
2024 election graphic
By Peter Heck 29 Oct, 2024
Here’s a brief comparison of the positions of Vice President Kamala Harris, Democratic nominee for president, and former president Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, to help voters decide which candidate most reflects their own ideas. Summaries are based on information from guides.vote and NBC news — visit their websites for more details and additional policy comparisons. Abortion, reproductive rights Harris: Would sign national abortion rights legislation if president. Trump: Takes credit for ending Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court precedent that decriminalized abortion; has said states should decide whether abortion is legal. Climate change, global warming Harris: “We must do more” to address climate change. Voted to commit $369 billion to combat climate change and support clean energy. Trump: “Climate change is a hoax.” Will expand domestic coal and oil production. Economy Harris: Supports expanded tax credits for childcare. Wants to lower costs of groceries and prescription drugs, and subsidize first-time home buyers. Trump: Promises increase tariffs on imported goods. Says he will free up housing market through mass deportations of immigrants. Promises to deregulate businesses. Education Harris: Supports universal pre-K, debt-free college education, increased teacher pay. Trump: Would abolish Education Department, eliminate teacher tenure. Supports “parental rights” regarding course content. 2020 Election results Harris: 2020 election results were certified, confirmed by numerous court cases — Joe Biden won. Trump: Election was “rigged,” Jan. 6 protesters were “patriots.” Foreign policy Harris: Calls for cease-fire and two-state solution in Israel, but Israel has a right to self-defense. Supports Ukraine’s war against Russian aggression. Would continue strong support for NATO and other alliances. Trump: Unreserved support for Israeli actions in Gaza. Would deport pro-Palestinian protestors. Will “end the war” in Ukraine by pushing Ukraine to cede territory already occupied by Russia. Has threatened to pull out of NATO unless other countries “pay their fair share.” Healthcare Harris: Would expand Affordable Care Act, link drug costs to those in comparable nations. Trump: Says he will end Obamacare, replace with unspecified new program. Immigration Harris: Supports comprehensive immigration reform, pathways to citizenship for DACA participants. Trump: Would deport 15 to 20 million immigrants; told supporters in Congress to kill a Senate bipartisan immigration reform bill in early 2024. Labor, Unions Harris: Supports “the sacred right to organize” workers. Walked a picket line with auto workers. Trump: Praised employers who fire striking workers. As president, restricted collective bargaining rights for federal employees. Minimum Wage Harris: Supports raising federal minimum wage to $15/hour. Trump: Questions need for federal minimum wage, claiming it “would eliminate jobs.” Social Security Harris: Would eliminate $168,000 income cap for Social Security payments, making wealthier Americans pay at same rate on all income. This would help ensure the continuing solvency of the program. Trump: Proposed $35 billion cut in Social Security disability programs. Taxes Harris: Supports higher corporate tax rates, voted against Trump tax cuts. Trump: Enacted largest tax cut in history for corporations and the wealthy. Voting rights Harris: Supports legislation to make registration and voting easier. Trump: Wants stronger voter ID requirements, sued to eliminate voter drop boxes. Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist. 
Vote Here sign
By Morgan Leason, Capital News Service 29 Oct, 2024
Election experts are concerned that partisanship and a lack of faith in elections could be a problem this November, mainly due to the public’s susceptibility to misinformation. Some are particularly wary that information warfare could happen in the final days before the election, when people can take in false information but there’s not enough time left to set the record straight. “Elections tend to be a tinderbox,” said Dan Avondoglio, an expert from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the federal government, also known as CISA. There are, he said, “opportunities to influence at the last minute.” With less than a month to go to national elections, experts gathered recently near the University of Maryland campus to talk about those worries, along with the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, a university-based research and education center. The shared consensus was one of concern. It’s getting harder to run elections, officials said, and the costs are rising. It’s easier than ever to spread false information and more difficult to counter it. Complicating all of it is the new and unpredictable role that artificial intelligence will play. Driving the costs are the expenses of training polling workers, the cost of auditing and the cost of protecting databases from cyberattacks, said Ben Hovland, who serves on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. “We are looking at an all-hands approach when it comes to this election,” Hovland said. And when it comes to polling locations, “those are even softer targets.” In the areas where the election is particularly tight, states and counties are under a microscope, and could be an active target for bad actors, Hovland explained. Cody Buntain, an assistant professor who studies misinformation and disinformation, said artificial intelligence should be a top concern. It’s the nature of social media to create filter bubbles and echo chambers, he said, limiting people’s exposure to content they disagree with. Because of that, he said, artificial intelligence has the power to “rapidly generate content that pushes on people’s existing beliefs.” Professor Doug Lombardi said the attack strategy of the 2016 presidential cycle has evolved and become more effective. Similar to the Russian propaganda of that era, he said, today’s actors are involved in “efforts to push on social ills and social fractures.” The solution is helping people think critically, Lombardi said, which means making decisions that help increase people’s agency and help fight confirmation biases. Amy Pate, director of the START program, argues that in today’s environment, misinformation has become not only cheap and effective but also difficult to correct. Pate said most people used to vote without consideration of how the vote gets counted. Now, she said, people need to know how it works in order to feel confident in the outcome of the election. Still, the consortium’s message is not all gloom and doom. The more skeptical and aware people become about election misinformation, officials said, the more capacity they’ll have to resist it. With more people aware of the election certification process, Pate said, “heightened awareness helps build some resilience.” Capital News Service is a student-powered news organization run by the University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism. For 26 years, they have provided deeply reported, award-winning coverage of issues of import to Marylanders.
Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton
By Angela L Bos, Daphne Joanna van der Pas, Loes Aaldering, The Conversation 29 Oct, 2024
If U.S. voters elect Kamala Harris – a Black, Asian American woman – president, it would be historic on multiple levels. This is now a real possibility due to voters’ positively evolving stereotypes of women politicians.
Show More
Share by: