Getting Around on the Eastern Shore

Peter Heck • September 26, 2023


Someone who’s moved to the Eastern Shore will quickly notice how few options there are for getting around.

 

City dwellers take for granted buses, subways, light rail, taxis, and rail and air services. For most Shore dwellers, any destination beyond walking distance usually means using your car, sharing a ride, or calling a taxi, an Uber, or the equivalent found in most local communities.

 

It wasn’t always like this. It will surprise some readers to learn that as late as the 1960s, there was regular passenger train service in Chestertown, with stops in Worton, Kennedyville, and other small Kent County towns. You could take the train to Wilmington, Del., with connections from there to the rest of the country.

 

With this link to the outside world, Chestertown was by no means unique. In the heyday of rail travel in the mid-20th century, you could board a passenger train in Centreville, Easton, Salisbury, Cambridge, Ocean City, and many smaller towns. Most branch lines on the Shore were maintained by the Pennsylvania Railroad. But nowadays, even the tracks in many communities have been taken up to make way for walking and biking trails. Freight service is still available for some parts of the Shore, the only vestige of what was once the lifeline of commerce in these parts.

 

The other all-but-vanished means of travel for Shore dwellers is by water. The peninsula’s numerous rivers once provided easy access for ships of all sizes to carry passengers and freight from Shore towns to Annapolis Baltimore, and beyond. The freight dock in Chestertown was often busy when I was a kid. And you don’t have to be all that old to remember when the Love Point ferry was a vital leg of everyone’s journey from the Western Shore to Ocean City. The Bay bridge killed it off, along with the passenger boats bringing vacationers from Baltimore to the resort towns of Betterton and Tolchester. There was, for a while in the 2010s, talk of a high speed ferry from Rock Hall to Baltimore, but it apparently never got off the drawing board. More recently, a feasibility study was commissioned by Anne Arundel, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Charles, and St. Mary’s counties for ferry service across the Bay; results of that study have not yet been made public.

 

Greyhound or Trailways buses are generally available in the larger towns on the peninsula. Greyhound stops in Elkton, Kent Island, Easton, Salisbury, and Princess Anne. Trailways stops only in Elkton and Salisbury, although it had service to Chestertown as recently as the 1990s. While many residents need a lift to the closest bus station, for a lot of us they’re closer and thus more convenient than the railroad stations in Wilmington or on the Western Shore. Click here for Greyhound information; here for Trailways.

 

For more local service, several bus companies serve much of the area. Delmarva Community Transit covers Caroline, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, and Talbot counties, with service five days a week and partial coverage on Saturdays. Shore Transit covers Somerset, Wicomico, and Worcester counties, with stops in Salisbury and Ocean City as well as smaller towns on the lower Shore. Some of the companies will arrange special pickups for seniors. But for many prospective passengers, infrequent pickups — often only twice a day — means they must leave at inconvenient times and often must kill several hours before the return trip.

 

Finally, almost every community offers some kind of car service for anything from a supermarket trip to an airport dropoff. Lyft and Uber are the best known of these, but there are also locally owned taxis and limos everywhere on the Shore. For something like an airport trip, you can arrange to be picked up when you return. Searching with your zip code should turn up several possibilities, but often a friend or neighbor can recommend one they’ve found to be reliable.

 

Given the small population of most Shore counties, there seems to be no economic incentive for installing significant mass transit services. There is occasional talk of putting in a high-speed rail link from the western shore to Ocean City to reduce the traffic on Route 50 at peak summer hours. A similar connection from Wilmington would also make sense. But those ideas are only speculative, and unless someone can make money from them, they’re probably not going to happen.

 

Thanks to Henry Ford and his competitors, most are used to the convenience of using their own car for most travel, local or otherwise. Getting a bus or train ride from your town on the Shore to somewhere in Florida or on the west coast sounds attractive, but it still leaves open the issue of how to get around at your destination. Unless you’re in a major city, or can bum a ride from friends or relatives, you’re going to have to rent a car, or spring for an Uber or taxi.

 

For now, transportation on the Shore is inexorably tied to motor vehicles. Yes, some of us are bike riders, and a few, such as the Amish, still hitch a horse to a buggy. But for most of us, getting around means owning a car — which nowadays costs more than a starter home used to — or getting a ride from someone.

 

Not everyone has or wants a car. Trains and buses produce significantly less pollution than autos and provide accessible travel for everyone. It would be nice to think there’s some better answer waiting to be found.

 

 

Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist.


Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More