Hedgerows and Birds of the Eastern Shore

Peter Heck • April 2, 2024


A few days ago, I had lunch with some Chestertown High School classmates and given that we’ve known each other for decades, inevitably our talk turned to memories of old friends, living and dead, shared experiences, and what’s changed.

 

A couple of the gang brought up their efforts to raise chickens, a common topic in a rural area. A key problem was protecting the birds from predators — foxes, hawks, and eagles. And that brought back a memory for me.

 

One of our classmates, Dan Gibson, was an avid amateur ornithologist — in fact, he became a professional ornithologist at the University of Alaska, his boyhood dream come true. Dan was especially interested in birds of prey. He raised a couple of hawks in his bedroom and once climbed a tree to look into a Great Horned Owl’s nest — a risky venture. But the bird he never encountered in his years growing up on the Eastern Shore was a Bald Eagle. They didn’t exist here.

 

When I returned to the Shore in the 1990s, my wife and I were driving from Chestertown to Rock Hall when she pointed to a bird above the road and said, “Look, there’s an eagle!” My automatic response was, “No, there’s no eagles around here.” I quickly admitted I was wrong — it was an eagle.

 

Bald Eagles and other large raptors, common in colonial days, became endangered after the introduction of the pesticide DDT, widely used after World War II. In 1963, there were only 417 known nesting pairs of eagles in the lower 48 states. In the 1960s, research showed that DDT caused the birds’ eggs to have dangerously thin shells, as well as harming many species the eagles preyed on. In 1972, the federal government banned DDT and the eagle population began to grow steadily. With Bald Eagles now common on the Eastern Shore, there are 71,400 nesting pairs nationwide in the most recent U.S. Fish and Wildlife survey, and 316,000 individuals.

 

I mentioned my eagle story to my high school friends, and several of them brought up a related point. “I haven’t seen a quail in years,” said one, and another said the same of whippoorwills — two birds whose distinctive calls were heard widely across Kent County fields in our younger years. What happened to these once-commonplace birds? “They went away when the hedgerows got cut down,” was the answer.

 

Loss of habitat has hit many species hard. Populations of bobwhite quail have declined by 85% since the mid-1960s, according to a study by Cornell University. Another study showed that whippoorwill populations have declined by 60% over a similar period. And for these East Coast birds, as for other small birds and mammals, hedgerows were an important part of their habitat.

 

Hedgerows may not be something you think about, and are certainly not part of a city person’s experience. The main thing most people know about hedgerows is the experience of Allied troops fighting through the Normandy hedgerows after D-Day. But hedgerows — lines of trees and bushes that mark the edge of a property — aren’t just an Old-World thing. They were once common in the English colonies, including the Eastern Shore.

 

Hedgerows differ from a hedge you might find in front of your house because they’re made up of several species instead of just one. Also, while garden hedges are usually trimmed in neat, geometric shapes, hedgerows are left mostly untended — “little lines of sportive wood run wild,” as William Wordsworth described hedgerows he saw while he was on a walking tour in Wales in 1798. This makes them good habitat for small animals and birds, providing them with shelter and food.

 

There’s a cost to this, of course. A hedgerow takes up more of an adjacent field than just a fence. Needing the largest crop yield, a farmer is likely to find it hard to justify, especially when corporations now own more farms and the bottom line is harder to ignore. What are a few songbirds and fluffy bunnies compared to an extra chunk of tillable land?

 

That question had a different answer in the days of small family farms, when a farmer — or the farmer’s kids — might supplement family meals by hunting. My grandfather, who owned a farm near Worton in the early days of the last century, regularly brought home rabbits and squirrels for supper. Quail and squab were regular additions to the menu, as well. My grandfather had stopped hunting by the time I came along, but several of the guys I knew in high school regularly supplemented the family larder with small game.

 

Nowadays, of course, few of us depend on hunting to eat, but there’s much to be said for maintaining a habitat for the small creatures that live in hedgerows. There are still bobwhites and whippoorwills, even if we don’t hear them as often. And too many species have gone extinct because of the human race’s thoughtless destruction of their habitats, with more disappearing every year. It would be more responsible to instead maintain — and, where possible, restore — those habitats.

 

We’re probably not going to have much luck getting factory farms to forgo acreage for the sake of wildlife habitat, but you can do something on your own property, especially if you have a good-sized yard. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources suggests creating your own hedgerows; not only do they provide wildlife with shelter and food, they can reduce energy costs by sheltering your home from winds. The DNR has suggestions for what types of trees and bushes to plant and how to maintain them.

 

It’s not an easy project, nor is it something that can fit on everybody’s property. And it’s not something that will show results overnight. But if planting a hedgerow would work on your property, it’s something you can do for the environment.

 

And who knows? Maybe one morning you’ll look out your window and find that one of the birds that went away has come back, thanks to you.

 

 

Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More