How the West Was Won — With Guns and Gun Control

Jane Jewell • October 24, 2023


Americans today argue loudly and vehemently over gun rights versus gun regulations. And many gun-rights advocates believe that they are fighting against the erosion of gun rights that have existed since America began. They frequently point to the so-called Wild West era as proof of those rights and a model for how things should be.

 

Most of these proofs, however, are fictions and myths, not history. Dime novels, Wild West shows, and stories around the campfire have created and perpetuated images of exciting adventures in the Wild West. Movies and television have brought the action, characters, and lonely western landscapes to life for millions.

 

These are tales of rare and exaggerated events. Most often, the incidents never happened. For example, there were few duels when two men faced each other on a dusty, wind-swept street as frightened townsfolk raced for shelter and the shooters’ pals leaned out of windows and doors to watch. Yet the legends, movies, and magazines make it seem as if such were everyday scenarios.

 

Shoot outs, saloon brawls, cattle rustling, Indian wars, train robberies, and posses in pursuit of fugitives — yes, all those happened, but with far less frequency than Hollywood would have you believe. There was violence and crime in the Old West, but when and where gun laws were enforced, there was significantly less violence. Such laws were sometimes ignored or applied selectively, but that is also true today.

 

Many Old West towns had stricter gun (and knife) regulations than do modern ones. Policies for "open-carry” and permit-less concealed-carry by anyone are now legal in cities that prohibited such in the 1800s. And one of the main arguments for this absence of regulations is the false assertion that that’s the way it used to be.

 

Those pushing for fewer or no gun regulations believe the Constitution and American history support their views.

 

Let’s look at that claim.

 

The United States of America was created in 1789 when its Constitution was adopted. One of the new government’s first acts was to consider a dozen constitutional amendments, and 10 became the Bill of Rights in 1791.

 

The Second Amendment has become controversial in large part because of the misreading and mythologizing of history, of the Wild West. It states that:

 

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

When the Constitution was written, “militia” meant informal or official groups of residents organized into military units to protect their communities. Local militia units took the place of a standing army and were similar in organization and function to today’s National Guard.

 

A major problem now is that hard-core proponents of “no-gun-laws-at-all” refuse to account for the phrase, “a well-regulated militia.”

 

Supreme Court decisions in the 1800s stated that the right of citizens to bear arms did not prevent state and local government from imposing reasonable rules on where, when, and how firearms could be used (i.e., “well-regulated”).

 

What were typical gun laws in the Old West?

 

Openly carrying guns and knives in most populated areas was generally illegal.

 

In Tombstone, Arizona, for example, in the 1880s, no one — not residents or visitors — was allowed to carry a weapon. Visitors were required to turn their guns in at the local police station or another designated location, such as a hotel. Upon leaving, their weapon was returned. Abilene, Deadwood, and Dodge City had similar laws.

 

In 1878, when Dodge City, Kansas, was incorporated, the first city law banned the carrying of guns in town.

 

Even before the Wild West era, many Eastern and Southern states enacted strict gun control laws. In 1812, Louisiana and Kentucky outlawed concealed weapons. Soon after that, carrying concealed weapons became a frequent cause for arrest, along with drunkenness and disorderly conduct.

 

Granted, there was much lawlessness and violence in new or transient frontier towns with many single men. However, despite dime-novel legends and glamorized Hollywood movies, many towns had stricter gun laws than today, and those that enforced strong gun-control had less violence and crime than those without.

 

While there were only a few Supreme Court cases concerning the Second Amendment in the 1800s, its decisions almost always supported the right of federal, state, and local governments to regulate firearms. This was true for most of the gun-related court decisions during the 1900s as well.

 

It is only in recent decades that the Supreme Court has tended to rule against gun-control legislation. Even now, there are gun restrictions which recent Supreme Court decisions have declared valid or declined to review — thus leaving those gun restrictions on the books.

 

Under the Second Amendment, is it constitutional for a citizen to “bear arms” without being a member of “a well-regulated miitia”? The answer has yet to be found for this practical, commonsense question, but needs to be, quickly.

 

 

Sources and More Information:

Pierre M. Atlas, “American gun culture is based on frontier mythology – but ignores how common gun restrictions were in the Old West,” June 29, 2022, The Conversation. 

https://theconversation.com/american-gun-culture-is-based-on-frontier-mythology-but-ignores-how-common-gun-restrictions-were-in-the-old-west-184932

 

History.com editors, “All Amendments to the US Constitution,” July 17, 2023.

https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/amendments-us-constitution

 

Matt Jancer, “Gun Control Is as Old as the Old West,” February 5, 2018, Smithsonian Magazine.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/gun-control-old-west-180968013/

 

Greg Price, “Second Amendment History: Biggest Supreme Court Cases to Affect Gun Control,” March 27, 2018, Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/scotus-second-amendment-cases-gun-control-861959

 

Marshall Trimble, “Did Most Old West Towns Have ‘No Carry. Gun Laws?” True West Magazine, Jan 5, 2018.

https://truewestmagazine.com/article/did-most-old-west-towns-have-no-carry-gun-laws/

 

Adam Winkler, Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America, W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.

 

 

Jane Jewell is a writer, editor, photographer, and teacher. She has worked in news, publishing, and as the director of a national writer's group. She lives in Chestertown with her husband Peter Heck, a ginger cat named Riley, and a lot of books.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More