Immigration and the Past and Future of America

Thomas Timberman • August 23, 2018

Introduction:

Immigration (legal and illegal) has been a highly emotional and divisive issue for a number of years, but particularly during the first 18 months of the Trump Administration. There have been various efforts to stop or limit entry of people into the US: immigrants from Muslim majority countries, the “Dreamers” who were brought to the US as young children by their undocumented migrant parents, and refugees from Central America.

Many Americans have been shocked by the impact of the Administration’s Zero-Tolerance approach that resulted in several thousand children being separated from their parents. In August 2018 more than 400 children still have not been returned, despite court orders to reunite the families. And the White House continues its efforts to build a large, $25 billion wall on the Southwestern border to keep people out. All of these actions have been, and are still being, addressed by Federal courts, while legislation aimed at resolving the most urgent immigration issues has stalled or failed in Congress.

These are familiar and fraught subjects. The following paragraphs set them aside and briefly describe the history of Americans’ shifting moods about foreign migrants and address the contributions immigration has made to the country.

America, the Land of Immigrants:

The nation’s founders — as well as their parents and grandparents — immigrated to the American colonies from Europe for many reasons: to avoid religious persecution and violence for many, to escape a rigid social structure and/or debtors’ prison for many others. But most of all, they came for a fresh beginning, a chance for a better, happier life. Similar motivations have attracted millions of additional immigrants to the United States down to the present day. During the 1700s and early 1800s, US immigration was largely free and open.

Today in 2018, many older Americans still recall the arrival of Cubans in the 1950s and ‘60s, of Koreans, then Vietnamese beginning in the 1970s, and more recently immigrants from Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, as well as other Middle Eastern and African countries. Many who witnessed these immigrants arriving — along with the politicians and policy-makers of the era — understood the magnetic appeal the USA exerts on desperate people and they accepted the humanitarian need as well as the economic and demographic benefits of accepting these newcomers as part of the American spirit and tradition. But now the prevailing attitude on immigration may be shifting back to something more hostile, something last seen in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries.

America, Immigration and Early Brush with Terrorism:

Sept. 11 was not this country’s first experience with foreign terrorism. More than 100 years ago, divisive European political ideologues, e.g., socialists, anarchists and reds, fueled by hyper ethnic/national grievances, launched riots and considerable unrest across Europe. Kings, princes, queens, and empresses were felled by bombs and pistols. And some immigrants brought these convictions and their violent eruptions to the US.

In 1901 US President McKinley was killed by Leon Czolgosz, a recent Eastern European immigrant who said he had been inspired by Emma Goldman, an Anarchist and a Jewish immigrant to the United States. Anti-Semitism, always latent, re-emerged as a problem. The following list of Federal legislation reflects America’s changing attitudes on immigration from the early 1900s to the current day.

1907 Immigration Act:


  • Doubled immigration tax
  • Banned most Asian immigrants
  • Broadened definition of “undesirable alien” to include uneducated, ill (physical or mental) and those likely to need public assistance

Dillingham Commission (1907-11):


  • Favored more sanctions on immigrants
  • Discriminated against Southeastern European immigrants

1917 Immigration Act:


  • Doubled immigration tax again
  • Introduced English literacy test for those over 16

1921 Emergency Quota Act:


  • Reduced immigration by 75%
  • Established quotas for countries of South and Eastern Europe

1924 Johnson Reed Immigration Act:


  • Restrictive quotas on Southern and Eastern Europeans based on 1890 census instead of the 1910 census
  • Excluded both Asian and black immigrants
  • Severely limited Jewish immigration

1939 SS St. Louis Incident:


  • US refused to allow 900 German Jews to disembark from the liner SS St. Louis
  • Some 350 were returned to Germany and about 1/3 died in concentration camps

1965 Immigration and Nationality Act passed


  • Reflected much changed, more welcoming, public attitude towards immigration
  • Removed the 44-year-old national origins formula
  • Ended ethnic, religious and geographic discrimination
  • Created visa preferences based on immigrants’ education, skills and family relationships

2017-present


  • Administration working to limit family members to spouse and minor children
  • Administration wants to cut substantially the number of immigrant visas issued

Recent data from the Department of Homeland Security illustrates that far from a massive flood of illegal aliens attempting to cross the US/Mexican border, the numbers are at historic lows.

America’s Growth and the Immigrant Role:

Essentially, without immigrants, the US population would have stopped growing in the early 1970s. There are three factors: (1) native-born women began having fewer babies, (2) the US death rate dropped but (3) net immigration (minus emigration) was large enough to reverse the decline in birth numbers, while the influx of younger people countered the natural aging of the native population. Without this impact, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — as just a few examples — would not have been supportable without the many billions of dollars these immigrants added to national and local tax revenues over the years. And without continued immigration, our population would age, engendering the problems that now confront Japan, Europe, Russia, and, soon, China.


Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More