More Osprey Reproduction Problems Found Around the Chesapeake Bay

Timothy B. Wheeler, Bay Journal • September 3, 2024

Fishery managers debate 'precautionary' menhaden harvest closures

Perched on a nest atop a green navigation marker in Maryland’s Harris Creek, the osprey glared, spread its wings and started hopping as a boatload of people drew near.

“That’s a pretty big nestling standing up,” observed Barnett Rattner, a veteran scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Eastern Ecological Science Center. “Last week, there were two.”

Peering at the agitated fish hawk through binoculars, Rattner spied the telltale reddish-orange eyes of a juvenile, so the boat halted its approach. They didn’t want to spook the youngster into trying to fly before it was able. It would almost certainly fall in the water and drown — perhaps the fate of its missing nestmate.

Rattner and USGS wildlife biologist Dan Day have been visiting osprey nests around Tilghman Island on Maryland’s Eastern Shore every seven to 10 days since early spring. They’re part of a multi-pronged effort to assess the birds’ breeding success around the Chesapeake Bay following a troubling report last year of a drastic reproduction decline in Virginia’s Mobjack Bay.

This year, researchers have been monitoring more than 600 breeding pairs of osprey in a dozen locations to see if the problem is happening elsewhere. They have been checking nests in 10 areas along both shores of the Chesapeake where menhaden, a favorite prey of ospreys, usually can be found. They’re also looking in two freshwater locations on Bay rivers where osprey rely on different fish for food.

The Chesapeake boasts the world’s largest breeding population of ospreys, estimated at 10,000 to 12,000 pairs. They have staged a remarkable comeback since the 1970s, when contamination from the pesticide DDT, ingested by ospreys from the fish they ate, devastated their ability to produce offspring. The federal government banned DDT in 1972.

While toxic chemicals still exist in the environment, the overall population of Bay ospreys continues to grow. But now, scientists are exploring a new potential threat: a lack of fish for ospreys to feed on.

Food shortage linked

In 2023, scientists with the Center for Conservation Biology at the College of William & Mary reported seeing a steep decline in osprey reproduction in Virginia’s Mobjack Bay, which lies between the Rappahannock and York rivers. They linked the breeding woes — even worse than in the DDT era — to a shortage of food, particularly Atlantic menhaden, a migratory fish that is the birds’ dietary staple there.

That finding has turned up the heat on a long-running controversy. Recreational anglers and conservationists have complained for years that large commercial harvests of menhaden near the mouth of the Bay in Virginia are harming other fish, especially Atlantic striped bass, which rely upon menhaden for food. That fleet works for Omega Protein, a subsidiary of a Canadian company that processes the menhaden at a plant in Reedville into animal feed and nutritional supplements.

The complaint has gone nowhere, in part because data are lacking on how abundant or scarce menhaden are in the Bay. Now, though, the report of nest failures in Mobjack Bay has given advocates fresh ammunition to press for a clampdown on the Chesapeake menhaden harvest. Following an Aug. 6 briefing by USGS scientists about osprey reproduction issues, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, which regulates the menhaden catch along the East Coast, voted to study whether to impose seasonal closures of large-scale harvests of the fish in the Bay.

What the USGS scientists have seen so far in mid-Bay Maryland is similar to what the researchers reported in Virginia. Ospreys occupied only a little more than half of the 90 platforms, navigational markers and other available nesting sites where the two USGS scientists saw ospreys in their study area, which stretches from lower Broad Creek into Harris Creek and then around the western side of Tilghman Island.

The vast majority of those ospreys that did nest failed to produce or maintain young. By mid-July, there were many more empty nests than those that had even a single chick, much less two or three. Cruising down Harris Creek, Rattner pointed to one loss after another: “That one had eggs in it. It failed. That one never got started.”

During his 47-year career with the USGS, Rattner has studied ospreys in several Maryland and Virginia rivers of the Chesapeake, as well as in Delaware Bay. As an ecotoxicologist, he was researching whether pesticides and other toxic chemicals in fish might be affecting the birds’ reproduction or survival. The good news is that, while there are still some areas of concern, contaminants are decreasing and don’t appear to be affecting the overall osprey population in the Bay watershed.

But Rattner said the rate of successful breeding he and Day have seen in their Eastern Shore study area this year is far below what he saw 10 to 20 years ago.

Multiple reasons for failure

“All kinds of things happen to nests,” Rattner pointed out. Crows may feed on eggs if a nest is left unguarded even briefly. Great horned owls and bald eagles snatch chicks. Storms can blow nests off platforms. Diseases take a toll, as does the relentless summer heat. And some osprey pairs — perhaps rookies at breeding — build a nest but don’t produce eggs.

On a scorching day in mid-July, female ospreys were perched on some nests, wings outstretched in a few cases to shield the young beneath from the broiling sun. The males usually hunt for fish while the females stay on the nest.

To see if food availability might be a factor, Rattner and Day have mounted battery-operated cameras in four nests to monitor the number and type of fish the adults bring back to the nest. In one photo sequence, a male osprey delivered a juvenile striped bass for two chicks to consume.

There have been glitches with the cameras, though. The scientists have had to replace batteries and make other adjustments, including shifting at least one camera from a failed nest to one with eggs or chicks.

One year’s fieldwork is just a snapshot, of course. Rattner said that more research is needed to identify trends and fill data gaps.

And the apparent surge in nest failures does not mean the Chesapeake osprey population is in danger of collapsing — at least not anytime soon, said Bryan Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology. Ospreys nesting upriver in the Bay watershed are still producing plenty of offspring, and the overall population continues to grow.

“This is a long-lived species,” Watts said. “With lifespans averaging 15 to 20 years, they can withstand a dip in reproduction.”

But because ospreys subsist almost exclusively on fish, he said, they are a good indicator of fish abundance. That’s the main reason for the nest surveys, he added.

To date, Mobjack Bay is the only place with direct scientific evidence that menhaden — or their apparent scarcity — influenced osprey reproduction. There, scientists conducted a controlled experiment, feeding some newly hatched birds an extra ration of menhaden and comparing their better survival with those subsisting on what could be caught in the wild.

Watts suggested that high rates of nest failure seen in the areas where menhaden are usually abundant provide circumstantial evidence that food availability played a role.

Sign of food stress

“A high proportion of failures after hatching and a larger proportion of one-chick broods is a clear sign of food stress,” he said. For example, along Maryland’s Patuxent River, one of the areas Watts monitored this year, almost 60% of osprey pairs that successfully reproduced had one-chick broods.

Greg Kearns, a naturalist with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission who’s been banding and monitoring ospreys on the Patuxent for 40 years, said he’d seen a significant drop this year in the number of ospreys attempting to nest.

And by early July, Kearns said he’d seen a lot of failed nests, particularly along the lower river, where menhaden traditionally make up the bulk of the ospreys’ diet.

There was something off about this nesting season almost from the beginning, Watts said. Ospreys returned to the Bay as usual in late February and early March after wintering in South America and the Caribbean. But many didn’t lay eggs in early spring or at all, he said. And many of the eggs laid in late spring either didn’t hatch or the chicks didn’t survive as summer temperatures climbed into the 90s.

“I think that the birds were squeezed with low food availability,” he said, “then ran into the heat wave.”

There were anecdotal reports that the schools of menhaden that return to the Bay every spring after wintering off the mid-Atlantic coast didn’t show up on time or at all this year. Some have suggested the Bay’s unusually low salinity the first half of the year after a wet winter and spring may have deterred them.

Of course, there may also be other factors affecting ospreys’ reproduction. Pete McGowan, a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said he suspects that nest predation has been a big factor in a near total failure of ospreys to produce young on Poplar Island, which is in the middle of the Bay about a mile west of Tilghman Island in Maryland. Only three nests out of 25 begun in the spring are still active, he said, with just one chick in each.

Poplar Island is not one of the 12 sites Watts and colleagues have been monitoring, but Watts suggested that at least some of those nest failures could still be an indirect result of food stress. If the male osprey doesn’t bring enough fish, the female may leave the nest unguarded to search herself, leaving it open to predators.

Fishery study delayed

So far, fisheries managers are not convinced that there’s a problem with menhaden. A 2022 stock assessment concluded that the coastwide population of the forage fish is not being overharvested. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, which oversees near-shore fisheries from Maine to Florida, has for several years maintained a cap on the commercial harvest of menhaden in the Chesapeake. Conservationists and angler groups, however, contend that the cap is too loose and that the Virginia-based fishing fleet is depleting the stock there.

There’s been no study, though, to settle that dispute. Virginia lawmakers agreed in 2023 to draw up plans for a study, but this year they decided to wait until 2025 to decide whether to conduct the research. Meanwhile, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission has rejected petitions calling for a moratorium in Bay waters of the type of purse-seine harvesting performed by Omega’s fleet. Angler groups have gone to court seeking to force a cutback.

At the Aug. 6 meeting of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Lynn Fegley, fisheries director for Maryland's Department of Natural Resources, urged the body to adopt seasonal closures of large-scale menhaden harvests in the Chesapeake as a precaution to ensure that osprey and other fish-eating birds and fish have enough to sustain themselves. She said the state's commercial watermen are also suffering because menhaden are the preferred bait for harvesting blue crabs, the state's most lucrative fishery.

Other commission members countered that there are a number of factors affecting osprey reproduction, including competition for food from other birds and fish. They also noted that warming waters from climate change may be prompting some fish populations to shift farther north and away from the Bay. Pat Geer, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission's fisheries chief, argued that without more scientific evidence, it would be inappropriate to single out the state's Omega fleet for seasonal harvest closures.

The commission staff is in the process of updating "ecological reference points" it had adopted in 2020 to ensure there are enough menhaden left unharvested to sustain fish-eating birds and other fish.

Fegley's motion, which would have set the commission on a course to impose seasonal closures, failed. Then Allison Colden, Maryland director of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and a commission member, proposed instead that a work group be formed to evaluate options for "precautionary" management of menhaden in the Bay, including possibly seasonal closures. It passed unanimously. The group is to make at least a preliminary report at the commission's next meeting in October.

This article was originally published in the Bay Journal, a non-profit news source that provides the public with independent reporting on environmental news and issues in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Mail

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Congressman Harris Faces Online Criticism Over Epstein Vote, But Local Media Remains Quiet

By Jan Plotczyk • August 20, 2025

Congressman Andy Harris is facing a steady stream of criticism on social media following his vote against releasing the full files related to Jeffrey Epstein in July. The House of Representatives blocked the release of the files on a 211 to 210 vote. Since his vote, commenters on nearly every post from Congressman Harris’s official Facebook page have repeatedly raised the issue, questioning his decision and asking for an explanation. The comments are often similar in wording and appear across different topics, from agriculture updates to health care policy. In addition to individual commenters, local advocacy pages such as Decency for District 1 have been highlighting Harris’s vote since July 31. The page has consistently called for greater transparency, arguing that constituents deserve to know why their representative opposed making the records public. Despite the visible online pushback, no major Eastern Shore news outlet has yet reported on Harris’s vote or the public response to it. Neither local television stations nor regional newspapers have published stories on the controversy, leaving the discussion largely confined to social media platforms. The Epstein files vote has drawn national attention in recent weeks, as lawmakers in both parties have faced questions about whether more information should be released. In a town hall at Chesapeake College, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen talked about the importance of transparency and the need to release the files; he offered an amendment in the Senate to force the release. Rep. Harris, the Eastern Shore’s lone representative in Congress, has not issued a public statement addressing his position beyond his recorded vote. For now, the conversation remains one-sided. Constituents continue to press the question online, while traditional media outlets in the district have yet to engage with the story. Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.

Marylanders Will Lose A Lot Due to Trump and GOP

By Jan Plotczyk • August 20, 2025

Donald Trump promised he would lower costs on Day One. A lot of people believed him. (Some still do.) But instead of addressing the economic concerns that got him elected, he pushed his One Big Beautiful Bill into law. Instead of lowering the cost of energy and groceries for regular folks, his OBBB gives handouts to the rich. The Democratic National Committee has put together a website that details all the ways we lose and the rich guys win. They’re calling it the Trump Tax. Here’s what they have to say. Nationally,

“The ICE Man Cometh”

By John Christie • August 12, 2025

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures.” It applies to all seizures of a person, including seizures that involve only a brief detention short of traditional arrest. As interpreted by the Supreme Court in an immigration context, except at the border, the Fourth Amendment prohibits immigration enforcement officers to make detentive stops unless they are aware of “specific articulable facts that reasonably warrant suspicion” that the person detained may be illegally in the country. Reasonable suspicion cannot be based on “generalizations” that, if accepted, would cast suspicion on large segments of the law-abiding population. On June 6, 2025, federal law enforcement arrived in Los Angeles to participate in what federal officials have described as “the largest Mass Deportation Operation . . . in History.” U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents and officers were sent to join officers from the Enforcement and Removal Operations directorate of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) to carry out “Operation At Large” in Los Angeles, California. This operation involved teams of three to five agents who temporarily detained individuals in public places such as streets, sidewalks, and publicly accessible portions of businesses, and made arrests for immigration violations. On July 2, five individual plaintiffs and three membership associations sued twelve senior federal officials, who share responsibility for directing federal immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area, alleging a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Perdomo v. Noem (C. D. Cal). The complaint asserts that by an ongoing policy and/or practice, detentive stops in the Central District of California were being conducted without reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law. Reviewing the evidence offered by the plaintiffs in support of an injunction pending further litigation, the district court found that circumstances surrounding the stops were coercive enough that the interactions were not consensual. The district court also found that the plaintiffs are “likely to succeed in showing that seizures were based only upon four enumerated factors” or a subset of them. Those factors were (1) apparent race or ethnicity; (2) speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent; (3) presence at a particular location; and (4) the type of work one does. The district court then concluded that in the context of the Central District of California, those four enumerated factors — even when considered together — describe only a broad profile and “do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop.” Moreover, the court determined that, despite there being no evidence of an “official policy” of making stops based only on the four factors and without reasonable suspicion, there was sufficient evidence to show that defendants’ agents were routinely doing so. Premised on these conclusions, on July 11, the district enjoined the defendant officials from relying solely on the factors below, alone or in combination, to form reasonable suspicion for a detentive stop: Apparent race or ethnicity; Speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent; Presence at a particular location (e.g., bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc.); or The type of work one does. The administration appealed the district court’s order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which refused to intervene. Perdomo v. Noem (July 28). The three judge panel determined that “a characteristic common to both legal and illegal immigrants does little to arouse reasonable suspicion.” In the U.S. generally, apparent Hispanic or Latino race or ethnicity generally has limited probative value, because large numbers of native-born and naturalized citizens have the physical characteristics identified with Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Speaking Spanish and speaking English with an accent are likewise characteristics that apply to a sizable portion of individuals lawfully present in this country. As to location, the Supreme Court has made clear that an individual’s presence at a location that illegal immigrants are known to frequent does little to support reasonable suspicion when U.S. citizens and legal immigrants are also likely to be present at those locations. US v. Brignoni (1975). Like location, the type of work one does is at most “marginally relevant” to establishing reasonable suspicion, even if it is work commonly performed by immigrants without legal status. Evidence that a particular employer is employing a large number of undocumented workers does not create reasonable suspicion as to each individual employee. On August 7, the administration once more sought emergency relief from the Supreme Court. In doing so, the Solicitor General asserts that the injunction entered puts “a straitjacket on law-enforcement efforts.” Although this case arises out of ICE activities in Southern California, the Supreme Court’s ultimate decision will have obvious implications for the practices of ICE agents nationwide. John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.

Trump’s Treatment of Immigrant Workers Will Make Food Prices Even Higher

By Jan Plotczyk • August 12, 2025

Across the U.S. food supply chain, more than one in five jobs is carried out by immigrants, the equivalent of 14 million workers across the sector. But many of these foreign-born workers — regardless of legal status — are afraid that they’ll be swept up in the administration’s illegal and cruel arrest, detention, and deportation actions. So, they’ve started staying home. The long-term effects of losing a substantial portion of the workforce will send a shock through the industry: crops will not be harvested, livestock will not be processed, grocery shelves will thin out, restaurants and food trucks will close, and food will get more expensive than it already is.

Live Event: Can Eastern Neck Survive Federal Funding Cuts?

By CSES Staff • August 12, 2025

Eastern Neck National Wildlife Refuge is threatened by federal budget and staffing cuts. We are fortunate to have this unspoiled, undeveloped public land in Kent County. More than 70,000 people visit ENNWR annually for recreation and to enjoy its natural beauty. In April, Common Sense for the Eastern Shore published an article asking for help in spreading the word about the threat to ENNWR. The need for support in the face of this threat still exists. If you’d like to know more and would like to pitch in to help, Citizens Connect is holding an informational session: Monday, August 18, 5-6:30 pm Unitarian Universalists of the Chester River, 914 Gateway Dr, Chestertown The presentation and discussion will be led by members of the Board of Directors of Friends of Eastern Neck, Bill Burton, president, and Bonnie Ford, vice president. The session will cover how drastic budget cuts to the US Fish & Wildlife Service jeopardize the health of the refuge and threaten its survival. Without adequate staff, Eastern Neck could be “shuttered," public access curtailed, and the Visitors Center closed. Invasive plants would grow unchecked, migratory waterfowl would be at risk, and hunts would end.

Salisbury Mayor Involved in Fourth Car Accident: Community Pushes Back on “Pattern of Recklessness”

By CSES Staff • August 6, 2025

Mayor Randy Taylor is once again at the center of controversy after being involved in a traffic incident Monday morning, his fourth car accident in less than two years since taking office. According to Mayor Taylor’s official statemen t, the accident occurred around 8:30 a.m. on South Boulevard and involved a pedestrian using a walker. Taylor described the incident as “minor,” claiming that only the wheel of the pedestrian’s walker made contact with the rear of his city-issued vehicle. He further stated that the pedestrian refused medical treatment and that all protocols were followed. However, eyewitness accounts and photos circulating on social media paint a different picture. A bystander who witnessed the event posted that the mayor struck the pedestrian in the crosswalk and initially continued driving as if he had “hit a cone,” before returning to the scene. The witness described a delayed police response and expressed frustration that no other vehicles stopped to assist. Photos of the aftermath show a visibly shaken pedestrian, leaning on his walker, with Mayor Taylor standing nearby inspecting the damage. The images have sparked widespread outrage across the community. “This is not an isolated event,” said one resident in a viral post. “This is his fourth accident since taking office, and every time it’s brushed off as a ‘minor issue.’ How many more ‘minor issues’ will it take before there’s real accountability?” The mayor’s track record with city vehicles has drawn sharp criticism, with many Salisbury residents demanding answers about why repeated accidents have not resulted in consequences. Previous incidents have ranged from parking lot collisions to property damage, all involving city vehicles. Calls for transparency have intensified, with community members pressing for clarity on whether mandatory post-accident drug and alcohol tests were administered, as required by city policy. Mayor Taylor maintains that all procedures were followed and has promised to share a final report of the incident within 10 days. In the meantime, public confidence continues to erode, with many expressing frustration over what they see as a dangerous pattern of recklessness. “Four accidents in two years,” another commenter posted. “If a city worker had that record, they’d be gone. Why does the mayor get a free pass?” Neither the Salisbury Police Department nor Maryland State Police has issued an official report yet.