More Women than Men Seeking Higher Education Nationwide, Including the Eastern Shore and Delaware

George Shivers • February 28, 2023


More women than men in the United States are now going to college, and have been for some time.

 

In a March 2022 article on the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis website, Oksana Leukhina and Amy Smaldone wrote that fall college enrollment figures reported almost twice as many women as men enrolling.

 

In 1970, as noted by Leukhina and Smaldone, men outnumbered women in college, accounting for 57% of enrollment in four-year institutions and 59% in two-year institutions. They suggest that at that time, more men were in college to avoid the Vietnam-era draft. By 1980, gender balance was reached in four-year institutions, while women outnumbered men in two-year schools. After 1980, gender imbalance steadily increased, with women dominating college enrollments.

 

Here is a brief look at the evolution of higher education on the Eastern Shore and in Delaware.

 

The oldest Eastern Shore college — and one of the oldest in the nation — is Washington College in Chestertown. Founded in 1782, for its first century, the college admitted only men. Women were admitted in 1891, mostly in the “normal” department to become teachers.

 

The oldest institution of higher education in Delaware is the University of Delaware, in Newark. Founded in 1743 as a free school in Pennsylvania, the school moved to Newark in 1765. The school was incorporated as Newark College in 1833 and granted the power to confer degrees. Like Washington College, the college enrolled only men early on. Newark College was renamed the University of Delaware in 1921, and became coeducational in 1945, after it merged with the Women’s College of Delaware.

 


The other Eastern Shore and Delaware colleges admitted women from the start. University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, was established in 1886 by the Delaware Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church to educate African Americans. In 1900, it was named Princess Anne Academy. After passing from church control to state ownership. in 1948, it was named Maryland State College, and achieved university status in 1970.

 

Salisbury University began in 1925 as a “normal” school to prepare public school teachers with a two-year program. In 1931, it was increased to a three-year curriculum, and in 1934, was renamed Maryland State Teachers College. The four-year curriculum came in 1935. In 1947 and in 1960, more programs in the arts and sciences were introduced. In 1963, the college was renamed as Salisbury State College, and became Salisbury University in 2001.

 


There are three community colleges on the Eastern Shore. Chesapeake College was founded in 1965 to serve the Upper Eastern Shore. Wor-Wic College was founded 10 years later to serve the the lower Eastern Shore. Cecil College in Elkton started in 1968.



For purposes of comparison nationwide, 56% of students enrolling in college in the same year were women. With regard to graduating students, Jessica Bryant in a July 8, 2022 article (“Women Continue to Outnumber Men in College Completion”) noted that of two million bachelor’s degrees conferred in the U.S. during the 2019-2020 academic year, 58% were received by women.

 

How is this trend explained? Leukhina and Smaldone suggest that:

 

  1. Girls increasingly outperform boys at the high school level.
  2. Girls recognize that more education is one way of closing the gender pay gap.

 

A study in “The Feed” by Georgetown University in September 2021 indicates that women have made up the majority of college enrollments for four decades.

 

The article cites Kevin Carey, who wrote in the New York Times that “there are still some good-paying jobs available to men without college credentials,” whereas “there are relatively few for such women.”

 

Carey directs the Education Policy Program at New America (formerly the New America Foundation). He thinks that men who graduate from college are more likely than women to end up in high-paying fields. The biggest problem, he says, is in the decline in male attendance at two-year colleges, which he calls a “calamity.”

 

In an article for Pew Research in November 2021, Kim Parker reports that the educational gains by women are parallel to their greater participation in the labor force. These gains are also related to structural changes in the economy.

 

Forty-two percent of men and women who did not complete college degrees attribute it to cost. Thirty-six percent attribute their decision to not enroll or to drop out to the need to work to help support their family. Men are more likely than women to attribute their decision to factors related to personal choice. Thirty-four percent explain their decision by saying they just didn’t want to continue to study beyond high school. Non-college-educated men are more likely than women to give as their reason for not getting a degree that they didn’t need more education for the job or career they wanted (26% of men; 20% of women).

 

Finally, it seems that men, more than women, do not see the need for a college education to achieve their life goals. Women, on the other hand, think that the college degree will give them more opportunities in the job market. The cost of a college education is a factor for both. That may be mitigated for women because their high school performance record may make them more eligible for financial aid.

 

NOTE: I recommend that anyone who would like to dig more deeply into the gender disparity in education and the workplace read the “Falling Behind, What’s the Matter with Men?” by Idrees Kahloon in the January 20, 2023, edition of the New Yorker.

 

 

Additional Source:

Washington, the College at Chester, Chestertown: the Literary House Press of Washington College, 2000.

 

 

A native of Wicomico County, George Shivers holds a doctorate from the University of Maryland and taught in the Foreign Language Dept. of Washington College for 38 years before retiring in 2007. He is also very interested in the history and culture of the Eastern Shore, African American history in particular.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More