Native American Names on the Eastern Shore

Peter Heck • March 15, 2022


Place names occupy a unique juncture between language, geography, and history, so it’s no wonder people find them fascinating. Maryland’s Eastern Shore has an interesting mix of place names that tells us something about the territory and those who lived here.

 

As elsewhere across America, places are named for early settlers, for where they came from, from local geographic features, for industries important to the area, even for the emotions they aroused in some early visitor.

 

We find all these categories on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Descriptive names, drawn from a feature of the landscape or natural surroundings, include Ocean City, Still Pond, Piney Neck, Chesapeake City, and dozens more. Centreville and Marydel — a small town straddling the Maryland/Delaware border — are minor variants on the theme, drawing their names from their location.

 

Smith Island, Kennedyville, and Preston honor early settlers or prominent residents. I take a bit of pleasure in knowing that Smithtown, in Kent County, is named for the carpenter who built many of the first houses there — Hyland Pennington Smith, one of my ancestors.

 

Other place names draw on settlers’ nostalgia for home, mostly in the British Isles. It’s no surprise to find Kent, Worcester, Somerset, Dorchester, Cambridge, and Oxford sprinkled around the Shore; they’re a little memory of home from the earliest English explorers and colonists. English history also played a role, with names such as Queen Anne’s, Princess Anne, Kingstown, and even Caroline County — named for Lady Caroline Eden, the wife of Maryland's last Colonial-period governor.

 

The original Native name was often lost to history after colonists gave it a name in their own language. Not so with the Bohemia River in Cecil County, named by Augustine Herrman after his native region in Czechoslovakia. The original inhabitants, the Susquehannock people, called it the Oppoquimimi River – though the meaning of that name is not recorded.

 

And that leads us to the most distinctive category of Eastern Shore place names: those derived from the language of the people who lived here before the arrival of the English — or any other Europeans. Native Americans on the Eastern Shore spoke local variations of the Algonquian family of languages, a large group that stretched from the Atlantic coast north into Canada, south to Tennessee, and west as far as the Rocky Mountains. The predominant dialect in the immediate area was Nanticoke, a language now considered lost, but in its time spoken by the Choptank, Matapeake, and Assateague — tribal names now preserved in Eastern Shore place names.

 

Other tribal names also survive as place names. “Assateague,” for example, is the name of a tribe in Virginia. But it also means “swift water” in the native language. Which came first? The answer is lost in the mists of time.

 

Monie Creek, in Somerset County, also takes its name from a small tribe that lived there before the Colonial era. And of course, the Nanticoke River takes its name from the tribe of the same name, one of the most important in pre-Colonial times. “Nanticoke” means “tidewater people.”

 

What we know of these native languages was originally recorded by people who were not trained linguists, although some of them undoubtedly had learned a little Latin and Greek in school, and some also had a smattering of modern European languages other than English. Upon hearing a word in the native language, most of these early scribes did their best to write it down as if it were an English word — although in the earliest days, before anyone had thought of creating a dictionary, even English spelling was somewhat haphazard. And unfortunately, the Native Americans of this region had not yet developed writing, so the only way words and phrases were preserved was orally.

 

Only after the Colonial period, when the native languages were already dying, were there more serious attempts to record them. For example, in 1792, William Vans Murray, a congressman from Maryland, at the request of Thomas Jefferson compiled a list of about 300 Nanticoke words from a native speaker in Dorchester County. In 2007, Nanticoke descendants in Millsboro, Del., initiated a project to revive the language, based on Murray’s list. About 150 other words were recorded around the same time from Nanticoke members who had moved to Canada. But with such a small vocabulary list, the meaning of some of the place names in the original language is open to interpretation.

 

The name “Chesapeake Bay” is a good example of what happens when amateur linguists record an unfamiliar language. The Algonquian word — most likely something like “tschiswapeki” — reportedly means “mother of waters,” or “shellfish water,” or “great salt bay.” These different interpretations, while undeniably appropriate, may reflect a variety of answers explorers received when they asked native speakers what the word meant (possibly mispronouncing it in different ways, as well). This problem is common in the translation of place names.

 

A similar story is the Chicamacomico River in Dorchester County; either of two Algonquian words could be the source of the name. “Tschikenumiki” translates as “place of turkeys,” but some scholars suggest it derives from combining “ahkamikwi” and “kehtci-cami” to mean “dwelling place by the big water.”

 

Several other bodies of water have names derived from native languages. “Choptank” is an Anglicized version of an Algonquian expression meaning “it flows back strongly,” possibly referring to the upstream flow of the incoming tide. Both the name of a river and a county, “Wicomico” comes from the Algonquian “wicko mikee,” meaning “place where homes are built”; it may be the answer an explorer got when he asked a native the name of his village. And “Pocomoke” has been translated as either “broken ground’’ — referring to the farming practices of the local people — or “black water,” referring to the river’s dark color caused by acid from the bald cypress trees growing along it. But it was definitely an Algonquian word.

 

The Manokin River in Somerset County also derives its name from a native word referring to digging. As with “Pocomoke,” it may refer to the farming practices of the original inhabitants.

 

Other Native American place names relate to characteristics of their locality. The Honga River in Dorchester County is an estuary along the Atlantic flyway, and like many other Shore waterways, it is a stopping-off place for large numbers of migrating Canada geese. “Honga” is an Anglicized version of “kahunge,” an Algonquian word for “goose.” Quantico Creek, in Wicomico County, may mean “long tidal stream,” although some scholars trace the name to another word meaning “dancing place.” And Nassawango Creek, which flows into the Pocomoke, gets its name from a native word meaning “between streams” or “between land.”

 

Also in Wicomico County are Rewastico Creek and Rewastico Pond. “Rewastico” reportedly means “lake of white deer.” A Nanticoke tribal legend says that a sacred white deer lived there. When a French hunter killed an albino deer nearby, an epidemic struck the Nanticoke tribe. Looking at the legend scientifically, it’s likely that killing the deer had nothing to do with the epidemic, which was probably caused by viruses brought by the Europeans. While white or albino deer are comparatively rare, there are still a few on the Shore, including recent sightings in Kent and Wicomico counties.

 

This sampling of Eastern Shore place names derived from Native American languages is necessarily incomplete — we’d love to hear from readers who know of other native place names. Feel free to send us a message. This colorful chapter in local history and geography deserves to be better known.

 

 

Peter Heck is a Chestertown-based writer and editor, who spent 10 years at the Kent County News and three more with the Chestertown Spy. He is the author of 10 novels and co-author of four plays, a book reviewer for Asimov’s and Kirkus Reviews, and an incorrigible guitarist.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More