Report on Maryland Legislative Summit, Pt 1
Tom Timberman • January 8, 2020
An all-day discussion of the upcoming 90-day Annapolis Legislative Session took place on Sunday, Dec. 15, 2020, at the UMBC campus. The summit, an annual event, was sponsored by the Maryland Legislative Coalition, a partnership of individuals and members of grassroots groups across the state focused on state-level legislation. About 150 people participated, including a group from the Eastern Shore, as well as General Assembly delegates and Coalition partners.
Del. Eric Luedtke, Majority Leader in the House, Chair of the Education Subcommittee, and a Montgomery County public school teacher, discussed recent major leadership changes, the legislature’s operations, and opportunities for citizens to influence outcomes. He was followed by a number of coalition partner issue experts. Those of most interest to our nine counties will be summarized with commentary in a second installment of this article in a future issue.
Leadership:
The election of the new Speaker of the House, Adrienne Jones, represents historic firsts: the first woman and first African American to hold the position. The Speaker appointed a lower shore woman, Del. Sheree Sample-Hughes, as Speaker Pro Tem.
In the Senate, the resignation of long-time President Mike Miller led to the election of Sen. Bill Ferguson — at 36, one of the youngest to wield this gavel. He appointed Sen. Melony Griffith as President Pro Tem.
Luedtke said these Senate and House leadership changes reflect a larger cultural and attitude change: both chambers are much more diverse and younger. Women now form the majority in the Democratic caucus.
Another change he mentioned concerns the expectations for the freshman class at each session. When Luedtke entered 10 years ago, new arrivals were told to be silent, listen, and learn. This is no longer the case. Now, Ludekte noted, newcomers bring fresh opinions and expertise, and they never stop thinking, talking, proposing, and questioning. They refresh and excite old-timers every year. He noted, in this regard, that the number of bills passed over the past 10 years has doubled.
How the Legislature Operates:
Legislation can originate in either the House or the Senate, but will have sponsors in both chambers. Summaries of proposed bills are read and then assigned to a committee.
The subcommittees contain the subject-matter experts and are the core of debate and drafting of each bill. Hearings are held. Some proposed legislation does not progress past the hearing phase because it is too complex or needs further consideration, and becomes one of many multi-session bills. Legislation sponsors do not want their bill to be rushed to a vote and turned down. One routine reason for a bill not to receive a vote is that it is too narrowly focused on one jurisdiction.
How to Influence Legislators and Legislation:
Luedtke advised citizens to develop relationships with their legislators rather than simply calling or writing to share passion or to exercise influence. Developing a relationship with one’s own or other legislators with special relevance to their interests is the best approach, he said. Voters want themselves be known as credible, sane individuals whom legislators should listen to.
On the other hand, citizens must struggle to get the same access to legislators as lobbyists get. Rather than calling or writing, lobbyists spend hours each day selling their clients’ positions on many bills. Voters must fight to have the same access and time as professional influencers have.
As well, voters should not pursue committee officials about bills unless they are personal acquaintances. For one reason, chairs and vice chairs have little time during the short legislative sessions. Furthermore, they don’t have much to do with a bill’s content until the bill reaches its assigned committee.
The bottom line for convincing any Maryland legislator that your opinion or position on specific legislation makes good sense is: don’t get angry and yell at them, but rather develop a familiarity that will encourage them to spend some time with you or your group.
Del. Eric Luedtke, Majority Leader in the House, Chair of the Education Subcommittee, and a Montgomery County public school teacher, discussed recent major leadership changes, the legislature’s operations, and opportunities for citizens to influence outcomes. He was followed by a number of coalition partner issue experts. Those of most interest to our nine counties will be summarized with commentary in a second installment of this article in a future issue.
Leadership:
The election of the new Speaker of the House, Adrienne Jones, represents historic firsts: the first woman and first African American to hold the position. The Speaker appointed a lower shore woman, Del. Sheree Sample-Hughes, as Speaker Pro Tem.
In the Senate, the resignation of long-time President Mike Miller led to the election of Sen. Bill Ferguson — at 36, one of the youngest to wield this gavel. He appointed Sen. Melony Griffith as President Pro Tem.
Luedtke said these Senate and House leadership changes reflect a larger cultural and attitude change: both chambers are much more diverse and younger. Women now form the majority in the Democratic caucus.
Another change he mentioned concerns the expectations for the freshman class at each session. When Luedtke entered 10 years ago, new arrivals were told to be silent, listen, and learn. This is no longer the case. Now, Ludekte noted, newcomers bring fresh opinions and expertise, and they never stop thinking, talking, proposing, and questioning. They refresh and excite old-timers every year. He noted, in this regard, that the number of bills passed over the past 10 years has doubled.
How the Legislature Operates:
Legislation can originate in either the House or the Senate, but will have sponsors in both chambers. Summaries of proposed bills are read and then assigned to a committee.
The subcommittees contain the subject-matter experts and are the core of debate and drafting of each bill. Hearings are held. Some proposed legislation does not progress past the hearing phase because it is too complex or needs further consideration, and becomes one of many multi-session bills. Legislation sponsors do not want their bill to be rushed to a vote and turned down. One routine reason for a bill not to receive a vote is that it is too narrowly focused on one jurisdiction.
How to Influence Legislators and Legislation:
Luedtke advised citizens to develop relationships with their legislators rather than simply calling or writing to share passion or to exercise influence. Developing a relationship with one’s own or other legislators with special relevance to their interests is the best approach, he said. Voters want themselves be known as credible, sane individuals whom legislators should listen to.
On the other hand, citizens must struggle to get the same access to legislators as lobbyists get. Rather than calling or writing, lobbyists spend hours each day selling their clients’ positions on many bills. Voters must fight to have the same access and time as professional influencers have.
As well, voters should not pursue committee officials about bills unless they are personal acquaintances. For one reason, chairs and vice chairs have little time during the short legislative sessions. Furthermore, they don’t have much to do with a bill’s content until the bill reaches its assigned committee.
The bottom line for convincing any Maryland legislator that your opinion or position on specific legislation makes good sense is: don’t get angry and yell at them, but rather develop a familiarity that will encourage them to spend some time with you or your group.
Common Sense for the Eastern Shore
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
