Southern Baptists Deny Women’s Ordination as Pastors

Jim Block • July 4, 2023


Many Americans think that advances in women’s rights in recent decades may now be stalled or reversed. Recent Southern Baptist decisions confirm such fears.

 

In some ways, the conservative Southern Baptist Convention faces circumstances similar to those faced by the national Republican party. In the U.S. House of Representatives, a faction of right-wing GOP representatives made extreme demands on House Speaker Kevin McCarthy at the start of the term. Similarly, socially conservative SBC leaders have pushed to restrict women’s roles. At its annual convention in mid-June, the SBC, pushed by strongly conservative delegates, confirmed the expulsion of five churches for ordaining women.

 

Two of the expelled churches have been led by Rick Warren and Linda Barnes Popham, who are prominent Baptist leaders.

 

Warren, celebrity author of The Purpose Driven Life and formerly head of the huge California Saddleback Church, ordained three women in 2021. Saddleback and other churches ordaining women were dismissed last year by the SBC executive committee. Warren’s appeal of that decision was denied at this summer’s convention.

 

Popham, an ordained Baptist pastor, also found her Kentucky church dismissed. She argues that the SBC churches are harmed by the loss of women’s faith, talents, and efforts. In a New York Times story, she spoke of “a decline for Southern Baptists.” She believes the SBC is “going to discourage so many women from ministry … whom God has obviously called.”

 

The same Times article tells of a Michigan pastor who “believed that [Popham] interpreted the Bible incorrectly, and that churches that allow women pastors eventually ‘allow the marriage of homosexuals, too, and then even allowing homosexuals to serve as pastors.’” This domino theory argument may reflect the speaker’s anxieties, reluctance, and fears more than the eventual results of church government decisions.


Another major Baptist public leader, Beth Moore, found herself in conflict with some Baptist pastors in 2016. She was unhappy with Baptist support for presidential candidate Donald Trump after the “Access Hollywood” tape became public. She tweeted in April 2019 that she would be preaching on Mothers Day. That remark provoked SBC leaders to call for her to keep silent because traditional Baptist doctrine prohibits women from preaching. Moore thought her church should instead pay attention to SBC’s sex abuse scandal. She left the Southern Baptist church in 2021.

 

Some Baptists claim a woman’s position in the church is determined in the New Testament. They cite the letter of I Timothy that says, “women should learn in quietness and full submission” and that they should not “teach or assume authority over a man.” This apparently sexist scripture reflects its historical context, according to Christians who don’t take the Bible literally. They declare all persons are equal because they are created in God’s image.

 

Rick Warren wrote in a Washington Post opinion of his concern that the Baptist church’s current decline in membership will worsen because of the exclusion of women pastors. Moreover, he says, the church leaders who voted not to reinstate the churches with women pastors “have helped ensure that the once great SBC will be known as the Shrinking Baptist Convention.”


Two thousand churches in the convention have already designated female staff as pastors. If they were all dismissed from the convention, the public relations stink would at least equal the harm caused by the church losses. Currently, according to the Southern Baptist news service, for the last two years, the convention’s “total membership and the number of congregations” diminished.

 

The SBC may be the nation’s largest Baptist organization, but many American Baptist churches employ female pastors. According to Wikipedia, at least seven American Baptist organizations do so. Some Black American Baptists firmly welcome women pastors and have done so since at least the 19th century. Women in American Black churches play a significant and sometimes dominant role in their congregations. One reason for the large number of Baptist women pastors is that traditionally the national organizations allow local churches autonomy in decisions, including ordination.

 

Formerly a part of the SBC, the Baptist Women in Ministry group, which traces its origin to the 1970s, posts “An Open Letter to Baptist Women” on its website. The letter reads in part:

 

"Jesus did not make a mistake by calling the women present at the resurrection to preach the gospel, and he has not made a mistake in calling women to pastor, minister, and lead today. When anyone treats you as if you are not worthy to do God’s work, they are challenging Jesus’ own actions."

 

The letter has over 3,600 signatures. Fifty-six names are listed as “women targeted by a recent public list of women serving as pastors in Baptist churches.”

 

It is not clear how this will affect local Baptist churches or how many women Baptist pastors there are on the Eastern Shore. Some Baptist churches do not include “Baptist” in their names and a search of Shore Baptist church websites did not find pastors with female names.



Further reading:

Susan M. Shaw, “How women in the southern Baptist convention have fought for decades to be ordained,” The Conversation, June 1, 2021.

https://theconversation.com/how-women-in-the-southern-baptist-convention-have-fought-for-decades-to-be-ordained-161061

 

Susan M. Shaw, “A Primer on the SBC’s Complicated History with Women,” Sojourners, June 21, 2023.

https://sojo.net/articles/primer-sbcs-complicated-history-women

 

Beth, “A Letter to my Brothers,” LPM Blog, May 3, 2018.

https://blog.lproof.org/2018/05/a-letter-to-my-brothers.html

 

 

Jim Block taught English at Northfield Mount Hermon, a boarding school in Western Mass. He coached cross-country, and advised the newspaper and the debate society there. He taught at Marlborough College in England and Robert College in Istanbul. He and his wife retired to Chestertown, Md. in 2014.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More