The Decline of Landlines and the Rise of Political Polling

Jan Plotczyk • October 10, 2023


What kind of telephone do you use?

 

Do you have a landline? Do you rely only on a mobile (wireless) phone? Do you have both? Or do you not have any kind of telephone service at all?

 

The National Health Interview Survey has been tracking these statistics for 20 years. Unfortunately, they are not available on a county basis, so we can’t look at the Eastern Shore, but they’re interesting, nonetheless.

 

The NHIS is a federal government program that conducts interviews about health issues. They interview Americans by telephone and started asking respondents about their choice of telephone device when cell phones started to be a bigger presence in Americans’ means of communications. Twice a year, the agency releases a report with estimates of what they call “Wireless Substitution.”

 

Nationally, as of the end of 2022, two-thirds of American adults were “wireless-only” — they had their own wireless phone and lived in a household that did not have a landline. Here are the characteristics of the wireless-only adult Americans:

 

  • The percent of wireless-only adults decreased by age: 85% of adults 25-34 relied only on a wireless phone, whereas 40% of those over 65 did.


  • Hispanic adults (80%) were more likely than non-Hispanic Asian (73%), non-Hispanic Black (70%), or non-Hispanic White (70%) adults to be wireless-only.


  • Men (72%) were slightly more likely than women (71%) to be wireless-only.


  • Adults living in the West (76%), Midwest (74%), and South (74%) were more likely than those living in the Northeast (58%) to be wireless-only (Maryland is included in the South).


  • The percent of wireless-only adults decreased with an increase in family income: 78% of poor adults and 75% of near-poor adults were wireless-only, compared with 71% of adults with higher family incomes.


  • Adults living in rented homes were more likely to be wireless-only (85%) than adults living in homes owned by a household member (66%).

 

Quite the opposite are the adults who live in a landline-only household, which, at the end of 2022, was a smidge over 1%. Adults over 65 account for most of this group.

 

And there are those who, even though they own wireless phones, hold on to their landlines; at the end of 2022, these folks accounted for a quarter of adults. Adults over 65 account for most of this group as well.

 

Households without phone service at all has remained steady at less than 1% for a number of years.

 


Pollsters, researchers, and others who once relied on telephone communications to gauge the opinions of Americans saw the trend toward wireless telephone use and quickly changed the way they did business.

 

Using a sample pulled from the universe of landline telephone numbers was once an acceptable way to get a representative sample of Americans because most everyone had a landline.

 

But as wireless phones became more prevalent, the universe of landlines became increasingly less representative (see the statistics above to illustrate the uneven adoption of wireless technology among demographic groups). So wireless telephones were added to the universe.

 

However, wireless phone owners proved just as reluctant as landline owners to answer calls from unknown callers. So many survey operations moved online.

 

For online polling, representative samples are generally selected from an address file, not a telephone file. Respondents are contacted via mail, with an invitation to participate in a survey, and are then instructed on how to participate online; if the individual does not have online access, it can be provided.

 

But an opportunity presented itself with online polling that had not existed before: opt-in surveys. The people who participate in these surveys sign themselves up to get money or other rewards by taking surveys or they are recruited by a company. For example, after responding to a survey designed on the Survey Monkey platform, people are offered the opportunity to take another survey; certain credit card companies extend offers of rewards for survey participation.

 

Pew Research Center estimates that “more than 80% of the public polls used to track key indicators of U.S. public opinion, such as the president’s approval rating or support for Democratic presidential candidates, are conducted using online opt-in polling.” Hmmm. That sounds like a lot.

 

To try to gauge what effect this survey method has on results, Pew Research Center did a study. Published in 2020, the study surveyed over 62,000 U.S. adults using different online methods of surveying. Responses were then examined for quality.

 

The study found that online surveys can be influenced by “bogus respondents.” A bogus respondent is defined as a person who took the survey multiple times; or lived outside the United States (even though the survey asked for U.S. adults to respond); or gave multiple illogical or plagiarized open-ended answers; or always said they approve or favor regardless of what was asked.

 

The study found that the opt-in survey where respondents were paid or otherwise rewarded for their participation had a relatively large number of bogus respondents — 7%. The surveys where the respondents were recruited by survey companies had fewer (4-6%). These numbers are large enough to affect the outcome of a poll. The surveys that used a representative sample of respondents randomly sampled using addresses had too few bogus respondents (1%) to have any significant effect.

 

Fraudulent data generated by bots is also a problem — an “emergent threat to many opt-in polls,” according to the Pew Research Center. At least one commercial bot product is currently available to participate in surveys and polls.

 

The Pew Research Center is careful to state that, although their findings indicate problems with some online polling, polling is not broken. But there are problems with some methods of online surveying that will only get worse.

 

We’ve been warned by many sources not to put any stock in the 2024 presidential polls this early in the game. That sounds like good advice. Plus, we should also pay more attention to the way polling data are collected if we want to have confidence in the results.

 

 

Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More