“We’ve Always Been Free” — The Caulk Family of Morgnec, Md.

Jeannette E. Sherbondy • September 14, 2021

This is the story of Morgnec, Md. It was one of the first Black communities to form after the Revolutionary War.

Morgnec is located five miles from Chestertown, in a peacefully green piece of forest, with a United Methodist church beside the cemetery, all shaded by a grove of tall oaks. Tombstones for many families give witness to the length of time that Morgnec has existed. The church used to be the social center for the families that lived within a two- or three-mile radius: the women stayed inside while the men went outside to smoke and gossip, and the children played. There was plenty of room because there had been a campground beside the church for revivals.

The largest stone in the churchyard is inscribed for Joshua Caulk and his wife Martha. They are the foundation ancestors. Martha bore 13 children and five of them reached adulthood. Their descendants are proud to be Caulks.

Joshua Caulk’s father, Isaac Caulk, purchased a plot of land known as “Jacob’s Lot” and we have the map (shown below) of it when it was resurveyed in 1839. Jacob Caulk was a property owner in the 1790 federal census and both Jacob and Isaac Caulk appear as heads of families in the 1800 census.


The family history starts in the 17th century when a free Black man came over on a ship from England as a cook. Dorothy Campher, a Caulk descendant, stated, “A great stone was unearthed some 80+ years ago on the farmland now the Travilla Farms; upon this stone was etched the name ‘Joshua Caulk’ and an illegible date of 163… ” Another version was that he came in 1697. This is possible but unproved. The family claims that it is related to the White Caulk family that settled early in Kent County.

 

The story continues about a stone that emerged from the Chester River, according to Ms. Campher. “The stone was orange in color and the markings appeared to have been burned in.” She remembers that her mother had been a seamstress and “that’s how she come to be at the old Stradley Farm when that huge stone with Joshua Caulk’s markings on it was unearthed in a hearth. It was probably the size of the stone that prohibited William [her father] and his three sons from bringing it to the Joshua Chapel cemetery as Sarah [her mother] often requested, thus it lies somewhere today as mysteriously undetected as it once appeared.” Her story has a common African theme of a stone that emerged from the river and or from the earth, as was the case here. This was an African way to substantiate their claim to land in ancient times. She and others living in Morgnec firmly state, “We have always been free!”

 

Jacob Caulk was probably Isaac’s older brother. Jacob was born around 1745 and Isaac was born about 1760. Isaac died before 1843. Isaac’s son Joshua was born about 1785 and died in 1867, shortly after the Civil War. His wife Martha was born about 1798 and she died 80 years later. No one remembers Jacob or Isaac anymore. It is Joshua and his wife that for them are the founders. This is an old, old American family with deep roots into the 17th century.

 

The White Caulk family lived on the upper Sassafras River. In the 17th century their immigrant founder came from Sweden to New Sweden, now Delaware, to fight for Sweden’s claim to the land against the Dutch. “Caulk” was his nickname in the army because his hair was as white as chalk (“caulk” in Swedish). He left the army and fled to Maryland. There he married an English woman and claimed head rights (a legal grant of land). Of his four sons, two stayed in Kent County and two went to Talbot County. The two who stayed were Jacob, born in 1700, and Isaac, born in 1723 or 24. This Jacob had two sons, named (you guessed it!) Jacob and Isaac. There must have been a link of some sort between the two founders but there is no evidence at this time.

 

This White and Black pattern became the norm. The area became a checkerboard of related families, all of them becoming American in 1776. These families have had deep roots in Maryland for over 330 years.

 

 

Note: Dorothy Campher’s words were graciously provided to me by Karen Somerville after Dorothy died in 2004. My research was ethnohistorical: interviews, oral histories, historical documentation on the federal, state, and county levels. A big “thank you” to Kent County Clerk Mark Mumford and the staff at the courthouse who were always helpful and courteous.

 

 

Jeanette E. Sherbondy is a retired anthropology professor from Washington College and has lived here since 1986. In retirement she has been active with the Kent County Historical Society and Sumner Hall, one of the organizers of Legacy Day, and helped get highway /historical markers recognizing Henry Highland Garnet. She published an article on her ethnohistorical research of the free Black village, Morgnec.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More