Black History Tours on the Eastern Shore, Part 1

Jane Jewell • July 17, 2023

Young Frederick Douglass


Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman — two of history’s most famous African Americans — were born and lived their early years on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Both escaped from slavery, adopting new names in part to hide from “slave catchers.” Both became activists for freedom and civil rights for their fellow African Americans before, during, and after the Civil War. 

 

Today, with the help of self-guided or docent-led walking and driving tours, you can visit the sites where Douglass and Tubman lived and worked before escaping North to freedom. Sites are open to the public or visible from the road. The Eastern Shore is a beautiful rural area and a drive to these sites can be relaxing and inspiring.

 

Part 1 of this series focuses on abolitionist, orator, writer, and newspaper publisher Frederick Douglass. Part 2 will cover Underground Railroad conductor, Civil War spy and nurse, and women’s rights advocate Harriet Tubman.

 

Frederick Douglass (1818-1895) — originally named Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey — was born enslaved on the Holmes Hill Farm on Tuckahoe Creek in Talbot County, just south of Hillsboro. Douglass was raised with several other enslaved children by his grandmother, Betsy Bailey. His mother, Harriet Bailey, was enslaved on a plantation a dozen miles away. Douglass later said that he only remembered seeing his mother a few times before she died when he was about 7.

 

Douglass said in his early writings that his mother’s White enslaver, Aaron Anthony, was likely his father, but he later stated that he couldn’t confirm who his father was.



In 1826 at age 8, Douglass was sent to live and work in the Fells Point neighborhood of Baltimore, where he served as caretaker and companion for a younger White boy, Thomas Auld. He joined Thomas for lessons in reading and writing taught by his mother, Sophia.

 

Frederick’s attendance was abruptly halted when Sophia’s husband, Hugh Auld, found out about the shared lessons. Auld told his wife that education would “spoil a slave.” Besides, teaching a slave to read and write was against the law in Maryland and most other southern states. But by then, Frederick had caught the learning bug and he continued to learn on his own, secretly borrowing Thomas’s schoolbooks and even trading food with White boys on the streets for help with lessons.

 

In August 1832, when Frederick was about 13 or 14, he was sent back to the Shore to St. Michael’s. His original enslaver having died, Frederick was now enslaved by Thomas Auld, uncle of the boy he had served in Fells Point. This Auld was well-known as a hard, often abusive enslaver. A strong and hard worker, Douglass had also become a resentful and rebellious teenager and wanted to be free.

 

Six months after his return, in January 1833, Douglass’s labor was leased to a local farmer, Edward Covey. Known as a “slave breaker,” Covey used harsh physical and psychological treatment to break the spirit of an enslaved worker.

 

It didn’t work that way with Douglass, who endured months of mistreatment, including frequent beatings. One day when Covey began beating him, Douglass fought back. After a two-hour struggle, Douglass prevailed and Covey never laid hands on him again.

 

In January 1834, Douglass was sent to work on the nearby William Freeland farm where conditions were better. There he used his free time to start a Sabbath school and secretly taught local Blacks to read and write. Still determined to gain his freedom, he and four other enslaved workers made plans to escape by canoe to Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, their plans were discovered and all four were arrested. After a short incarceration, Douglass, instead of suffering the common fate for rebellious enslaved workers of being “sold South,” was sent back to live again with Hugh and Sophia Auld in Baltimore.

 

There Douglass learned the craft of ship caulking and was hired out to shipyards. At first the Aulds took his wages and gave Douglass a small portion to keep as his own. Later, Douglass was allowed to hire himself out, giving a set amount weekly to the Aulds and paying for his own food and clothes.

 

With this increased liberty of movement and some limited economic freedom, Douglass began to spend time in the local Black community where he met a freeborn Black woman, Anna Murray. In September 1838, she helped him escape to freedom in the North and his days as an enslaved worker were over.

 

Murray joined him shortly after his self-liberation and the two were married in New York. Family tradition says that Murray sold her feather bed to help pay for Douglass’s passage North.

 

The newlyweds soon left for Massachusetts where it was safer for formerly enslaved people than in “slave-catcher” infested New York City. It was in New Bedford that Frederick Bailey shed his alias, “Frederick Johnson,” and took the name under which he would become a famous orator, founder of three newspapers, writer of three autobiographies, and a life-long civil rights advocate. His adopted surname, “Douglass,” was inspired by Sir Walter Scott’s poem, The Lady of the Lake. In the poem, “Douglass” was “an exiled nobleman.”

 

Though not all the dangers to his liberty were over, at age 20 Frederick Douglass was free to begin charting his own direction in life.




The Frederick Douglass Driving Tour starts at Frederick Douglass Park on the Tuckahoe River near his birthplace. In the park are outdoor exhibits depicting his early years with his grandparents and cousins.

 

In nearby Easton, a statue of Douglass stands in front of the Talbot County Courthouse where Douglass gave his famous “Self-Made-Man Speech” in 1878. Then visit the nearby old Talbot County Jail House where Douglass was held after his first failed escape attempt over 50 years earlier in the 1830s.

 

Head to St. Michael’s where the 15-year-old Frederick started a secret school for Black people. You can stay at the Dr. Dodson House B&B, previously the home of the daughter of Douglass’s former enslaver Thomas Auld. Several years after the Civil War, Douglass was welcomed as an honored guest at the daughter’s home.

 

Also in St. Michael’s is the Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum which includes the Mitchell House where Frederick Douglass’s sister, Eliza Bailey Mitchell, lived. It is an excellent example of the home of a free middle-class Black family. Eliza’s husband, Peter Mitchell, was born enslaved but was later freed due to Quaker influence on the owner’s family. As a freed man in 1836, Mitchell “bought” his wife Eliza and their two children for $100. After the Civil War, Douglass would visit his sister and family there.

 

The St. Michael’s Museum offers a Frederick Douglass Walking Tour on the 2nd and 4th Saturday every month from May through October.

 

The driving tour continues to follow Douglass’s history, winding through the Eastern Shore then on to Annapolis, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., where Douglass lived and worked in his later years. In most places, self-guided walking tours and/or docent-led tours are available.

 

Despite the hardships of his early years in Maryland, Douglass felt a strong love and kinship for the Eastern Shore. Here is a quote from Douglass about his ties to Maryland.

 

“I am an Eastern Shoreman, with all that name implies. Eastern Shore corn and Eastern Shore pork gave me my muscle. I love Maryland and the Eastern Shore!

 

 

Jane Jewell is a writer, editor, photographer, and teacher. She has worked in news, publishing, and as the director of a national writer's group. She lives in Chestertown with her husband Peter Heck, a ginger cat named Riley, and a lot of books.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More