Candidates and Racial Justice — A Guide to the Maryland Primary

George Shivers • June 21, 2022


The United States has experienced a deadly growth in the White supremacy movement, as well as an increase in police violence against people of color. No candidate of either party running for governor or U.S. representative in 1st District raised the issue of White supremacy; however, all the Democratic candidates for both offices had statements on racial equity on their websites. Based on the statements on the websites of Republican candidates, it is clear that they do not consider racial equity a matter of concern.

 

The positions below were taken from candidates’ websites and VOTE411, a voter information website of the League of Women Voters. While the questions that the LWV asked the candidates did not address the topic of racial justice directly, it was possible find references in the candidates’ responses to other questions.

 

The primary election is scheduled for Tuesday, July 19. Only residents who have registered their political party preference are eligible to vote, and they may only vote for their party’s candidates. Thus Democrats may only vote for Democratic candidates, and Republicans only for Republican candidates.

 

 

Governor/Lieutenant Governor

 

Dan Cox + Gordana Schifanelli — Republican

www.dancoxforgovernor.com

There is no statement on racial justice on his website. All his positions are extreme right-wing and Trumpist.

 

Robin Ficker + LeRoy F. Yegge, Jr. — Republican

www.cutmdsalestax2cents.com

Ficker is a disbarred attorney. There is no statement on racial justice on the website. Most of the photos portray him in the company of conservative governors of other states.

 

Kelly Schulz + Jeff Woolford — Republican

www.kellyschulzforgovernor.com

Schulz’s program is typical of her party: less and lower taxes, support for police, parental control of the public education system. There is no statement on racial justice at all.

 

Joe Werner + Minh Thanh Luong — Republican

www.wernerformaryland.com

No statement on racial justice. He is also the only candidate for governor who has not submitted answers to the League of Women Voters website, Vote411.org

 

Rushern Baker III + Nancy Navarro — Democrat

www.rushernbaker.com

Rushern Baker III suspended his race for governor on June 10.

 

Jon Baron + Natalie Williams — Democrat

www.jonbaron.com

A statement on his website states that “My career over the past 20 years has focused on underserved communities across the United States, with the goals of closing social and racial gaps in education, economic opportunity, healthcare, and other areas. In our own state, such gaps between Black and White Marylanders have persisted for decades and are unacceptably large. Currently, for example, the poverty rate of Black Marylanders is nearly 50% higher than that of the overall Maryland population, and Maryland has had consistently larger achievement gaps between Black and White students than the U.S. average.” Baron worked in both the Bush and the Obama administrations to expand programs for underserved population.

 

Peter Franchot + Monique Anderson-Walker — Democrat

www.franchot.com

Franchot promises to create a new cabinet-level position focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion to promote diversity in government, to identify biases in existing or proposed policies, and to develop policies to promote economic relief for underserved communities. He indicates that his administration will prioritize addressing the effects of redlining and will seek to provide state-backed mortgages to communities of color. On the issue of public safety, Franchot supports policies such as “ending no knock warrants, prioritizing community policing, evaluating police training standards, treating addiction as a health issue, and focusing on violent repeat offenders.”

 

Douglas F. Gansler + Candace Hollingsworth — Democrat

www.ganslerformaryland.com

Gansler’s website has no specific statement on race, however, his running mate, Candace Bacchus Hollingsworth has a strong history of working for racial justice. After stepping down as mayor of Hyattsville, she worked to grow Our Black Party, a national organization that she co-founded to strengthen a relationship that promotes change between the Black community and the political system.

 

Ralph W. Jaffe + Mark Greben — Democrat

www.fedupwithcrookedpolitics.com

No statement on racial justice.

 

Ashwani Jain + LaTrece Hawkins Lytes — Democrat

www.jainforgovernor.com

No statement on racial justice.

 

John King + Michelle Daugherty Siri — Democrat

www.johnkingforGovernor.com

King will view every part of his platform through the lens of the “Black Agenda,” according to his website. As governor, he will require a Racial Equity Impact Statement to be submitted with every bill that comes to his desk.

 

Wes Moore + Aruna Miller — Democrat

www.wesmoore.com

According to his website, Moore believes that Maryland will never achieve its potential until equity is achieved. He applauded the Maryland legislature last year “for passing some of the nation’s most comprehensive police accountability legislation,” and believes that we have to build on that progress and see that it is carried out effectively. He supports policies in the criminal justice system that promote redemption and second chances. He also supports prison reform. He wants to promote equity in housing and access to education and healthcare. He stands for eliminating the racial wealth gap.

 

Tom Perez + Shannon Sneed — Democrat

www.tomperez.com

Perez has undoubtedly the most extensive statement on racial justice issues of all the candidates.

  • He pledges to combat and develop solutions to the climate crisis, which, he states, disproportionately harms Black citizens.
  • Further, he would reinvest cannabis tax revenue back into the minority communities that have been disproportionately and systematically criminalized for marijuana.
  • He will seek to make Maryland a leader in providing economic opportunities for Black business owners by reforming the State’s antiquated MBE (Minority Business Enterprise) program.
  • He will work towards increasing opportunities for Black business start-ups by expanding the Maryland Small Business Development Financing Authority, Neighborhood Business Works and EARN (Employment Advancement Right Now).
  • As governor, he will work to close the health care enrollment gap to ensure that 100% of Black citizens can access insurance.
  • He would support capital investments in Historic Black Colleges and Universities.
  • He would expand apprenticeship opportunities in the Black community and connect Black citizens with jobs in manufacturing through programs like the Jane Addams Resource Corp. in Baltimore, which provides free manufacturing job training.

 

Jerome M. Segal + Justinian M. Dispenza — Democrat

www.segalforgovernor.org

The heading on Segal’s webpage states “Bread and Roses Socialism: Decency and Renaissance.” While he doesn’t address racial justice, his statements promoting education and climate justice and economic equality clearly indicate that his administration would confront that issue in a positive way: “Most ambitiously, we seek a new culture, one in which personal identity and social status will have little to do with how one earns one’s money and the amount of it. We seek a culture in which identity and status will revolve around one’s passion — work, one’s values, character, and excellences.”

 

 

Congress 1st District

 

Andrew P. Harris — Republican — incumbent

www.andyharris.com

Harris has no position on racial justice issues on his website. It should be noted, however, that he was one of 186 Republicans in Congress who voted against the bill to designate a federal building in Tallahassee, Fla. to honor Black Judge Joseph W. Hatchett. He also voted against a resolution to honor Capitol Police for their bravery on January 6, 2021.

 

R. David Harden — Democrat

www.hardenforcongress.com

The following statement on equality and inclusion can be found on Harden’s website: “Every person must be treated with dignity and have equal rights under the law. No person in a free and fair society should make less money, be denied government services, pay more for healthcare, lose a job or housing opportunities, or face discrimination in the community or workplace because of their gender, race, color, national origin, age, religion, creed, sexual orientation, disability, or veteran's status.” He doesn’t propose any particular policies to solve those problems.

 

Heather R. Mizeur — Democrat

www.heathermizeur.com

Mizeur strongly supports the For the People Act on voting rights, which would expand access to early voting and voting by mail. She believes that the federal government must be the guarantor of the right to vote. She has no firm statement on racial justice on her website; however, she responds to a questionnaire on social issues on the ISideWith... website. She indicates support for NFL players who kneel during the national anthem to protest police brutality. She also supports the federal government policy requiring racial sensitivity training for employees.

 

 

A native of Wicomico County, George Shivers holds a doctorate from the University of Maryland and taught in the Foreign Language Dept. of Washington College for 38 years before retiring in 2007. He is also very interested in the history and culture of the Eastern Shore, African American history in particular.


Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
By Friends of Eastern Neck Board of Directors April 16, 2025
Let your elected representatives and business and cultural leaders know that our Refuge and others like it all over the country deserve to be protected. They deserve our stewardship for the natural wonders they shelter, and because they provide refuge for people, too.
By Elaine McNeil April 9, 2025
The Budget Deficit In a recent debate on closing Maryland’s budget deficit, Minority Leader Jason Buckel, a Republican delegate from Allegany County, made an important point: “The man upstairs has only been there for two, three years. I don’t blame him for our economic failures of the last 10,” referring to Democratic Gov. Wes Moore, who was elected in 2022. Ahead of the 2026 gubernatorial elections, Buckel’s comments highlight a key reality that many of his Republican colleagues seldom admit: It isn’t right to blame Gov. Moore for a budget deficit that has been brewing for years. Now projected at $3.3 billion, Maryland’s structural deficit is a problem that started long before Moore took office. In fact, it was first projected in 2017, during the tenure of former GOP Gov. Larry Hogan. This isn’t an opinion — it’s a fact that Buckel and other lawmakers, including Republican Del. Jefferson Ghrist, have bravely acknowledged. During that same debate, Ghrist remarked that the Department of Legislative Services had warned about this deficit throughout Hogan’s administration, yet he did little to address it. Ghrist pointed out that during Maryland’s “good years,” when the state received a flood of federal covid-19 relief dollars, spending spiraled without regard for long-term fiscal health. Hogan used these one-time federal funds to support ongoing programs, which masked the true state of Maryland’s finances and created an illusion of fiscal stability. Hogan continues to take credit for the “surplus” Maryland had in 2022 — even though experts repeatedly note it was caused by the influx of federal dollars during the pandemic. As Ghrist correctly observed, the lack of fiscal restraint and slow growth during the Hogan years laid the groundwork for the $3.3 billion structural deficit the state faces today. Indeed, Maryland’s economy has been stagnant since 2017, especially in comparison to its neighboring states, well before Moore took office. Compounding these challenges are President Donald Trump’s reckless layoffs and trade wars with our allies. Thousands of federal workers who live in Maryland are losing their jobs, which will cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue. Trump’s tariffs will also put an enormous strain on local businesses, including Eastern Shore farmers, who are now subject to up to 15% retaliatory tariffs on chicken, wheat, soybeans, corn, fruits, and vegetables. FY2026 Budget Considering this grim reality, Maryland’s lawmakers are making difficult, but necessary, decisions to shore up the state’s finances. Gov. Moore and state legislative leaders recently agreed to a budget that prioritizes expanding Maryland’s economy without raising taxes on most residents. In fact, 94% of Marylanders should see either a tax cut or no change at all to their income tax bill under the proposed agreement. Lawmakers also plan to cut government spending by the largest amount in 16 years, while at the same time making targeted investments in emerging industries, such as quantum computing and aerospace defense, so the state is less dependent on federal jobs. While the richest Marylanders might see their income taxes go up, it’s reasonable to ask someone making over $750,000 a year to pay $1,800 more to support law enforcement, strengthen our schools, and grow our economy. As for the proposed tax on data and IT services, these products aren’t subject to Maryland’s sales tax under current law. Maryland leaders want to modernize our tax code by levying a 3% sales tax on these products. Because they don’t raise income taxes on the majority of Marylanders and because state leaders are also cutting spending by billions, these ideas are fair. They’re also necessary after Gov. Hogan chose to kick the can down the road instead of addressing Maryland’s long-predicted deficit and now that Trump’s policies will lay off thousands of Marylanders and his tariffs will hurt our state. By making responsible choices now, Maryland leaders are putting the state on a path to long-term economic stability. Their decisions will help Maryland thrive, create jobs, and invest in the vital services that every resident relies on — without burdening hardworking families. I’m confident Maryland will emerge stronger, more resilient, and ready to lead in the industries of tomorrow. Elaine McNeil is chair of the Queen Anne’s Democratic Central Committee.
By John Christie April 2, 2025
Among Donald Trump’s most recent targets is what he calls “rogue law firms.” At 6pm last Thursday, March 27, he issued an Executive Order (EO) aimed at my old law firm, WilmerHale, as one of those “rogue” firms. Approximately 15 hours later, the firm filed a 63-page complaint challenging the EO on multiple constitutional grounds. The EO is an “unprecedented assault on the bedrock principle that one should not be penalized for merely defending or prosecuting a lawsuit” and constitutes an “undisguised form of retaliation for representing clients and causes Trump disfavors.” And by 8pm on Friday, March 28, a little over 24 hours after the EO was first issued, a federal district court judge in Washington granted a request for a temporary restraining order, blocking key provisions of the EO from taking effect for now. In doing so, the Court found that “the retaliatory nature of the EO is clear from its face. There is no doubt that it chills speech and legal advocacy and qualifies as a constitutional harm.” The Executive Order The EO and a so-called “Fact Sheet” that went with it recites that the Administration is committed to addressing the significant risks associated with law firms, particularly so-called “Big Law” firms that engage in conduct detrimental to critical American interests. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale) is yet another law firm said to have abandoned the legal profession’s highest ideals and abused its pro bono practice by engaging in activities that “undermine justice and the interests of the United States.” The specific examples offered in support of this conclusion: The EO asserts that WilmerHale “engages in obvious partisan representations to achieve political ends,” an apparent reference to the firm’s representation of Trump’s political opponents — namely the Democratic National Committee and the presidential campaigns of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. The EO cites WilmerHale’s “egregious conduct” in “supporting efforts to discriminate on the basis of race,” an apparent reference to the firm’s representation of Harvard in the Students for Fair Admissions litigation. The EO accuses WilmerHale of “backing the obstruction of efforts to prevent illegal aliens from committing horrific crimes,” an apparent reference to the firm’s litigation related pro bono practice and successful challenges to immigration related policies. The EO accuses WilmerHale of “furthering the degradation of the quality of American elections,” an apparent reference to the film’s involvement in challenges to restrictive state voter-identification and voter-registration laws. The EO singles out certain current and former WilmerHale partners, including Robert Mueller, for special criticism by describing Mr. Mueller’s investigation as “one of the most partisan investigations in American history” and having “weaponized the prosecutorial power to suspend the democratic process and distort justice.” The EO then Revokes security clearances held by WilmerHale attorneys; Prohibits the federal government from hiring WilmerHale employees absent a special waiver; Orders a review and the possible termination of federal contracts with entities that do business with the firm; Calls for the withdrawal of government goods or services from the firm; and Calls for restrictions on the ability of WilmerHale employees to enter federal buildings (presumably including federal courthouses) and on their “engaging” with government employees. WilmerHale’s Complaint WilmerHale engaged Paul Clement, a former Solicitor General during the George W. Bush administration and a well-known advocate frequently representing conservative causes, to represent the firm in this matter. Assisted by some 15 WilmerHale litigators, the complaint names the Executive Office of the President and 48 other Departments, Commissions, and individual Officers in their official capacity as defendants. A variety of constitutional violations are alleged: The First Amendment protects the rights of WilmerHale and its clients to speak freely, and petition the courts and other government institutions without facing retaliation and discrimination by federal officials. The separation of powers limits the President’s role to enforcing the law and no statute or constitutional provision empowers him to unilaterally sanction WilmerHale in this manner. The EO flagrantly violates due process by imposing severe consequences without notice or an opportunity to be heard. The EO violates the right to counsel protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and imposes unconstitutional conditions on federal contracts and expenditures. The complaint alleges that WilmerHale has already suffered irreparable damage in the 16 hours since the EO issued. The firm has been vilified by the most powerful person in the country as a “rogue law firm” that has “engaged in conduct detrimental to critical American interests. The EO will inevitable cause extensive, lasting damage to WilmerHale’s current and future business prospects. The harm to the firm’s reputation will negatively affect its ability to recruit and retain employees. Further Proceedings Temporary restraining orders constitute emergency relief upon a showing of likely success on the merits and irreparable harm were the temporary relief not entered. A later hearing will be held in order for the judge to determine whether a preliminary injunction should be issued preventing the government from executing the EO during the continued length of the litigation. Editorial Note: In light of the recent capitulation of several “Big Law” firms to the unreasonable and unconstitutional attacks by the Trump administration, WilmerHale is providing a blueprint for resistance as it fights back. More law firms need to be inspired by WilmerHale’s response to Trump’s demand for revenge on his so-called political enemies. John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
Show More