My Involvement in the FBI Surveillance of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (and my Resulting Loss of a Friend)

Sherwin Markman • May 11, 2021

In my time working for Lyndon Johnson in the White House, I was given a variety of tasks to perform. Here are two of them that — in a very painful way — ultimately overlapped.



Very early each morning, an Army car and driver would arrive at my home in Bethesda. The driver would have a briefcase full of documents received overnight and meant for the president. My job was to read them all, summarize them, and see that they were delivered to the president no later than 8 a.m. 

 

Surprisingly often, the morning packet contained missives from J. Edgar Hoover, the long serving FBI director, concerning Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. They were detailed reports on the FBI’s long-standing spying on Dr. King that was first authorized by Robert Kennedy when he was his brother’s attorney general. All of them were classified “Top Secret” and at times contained this statement: “For the president’s eyes only.” Ignoring Hoover’s admonition, I read every one, faithfully summarized it, and, without objection, delivered them to the president.

 

They were all based upon Hoover’s premise that Dr. King was a risk to our national security because he was an agent of our mortal communist enemies. Thus, for example, on April 17, 1967, Hoover wrote: “[Dr. King] has not only been willing, but even eager to support communist causes…to associate with prominent communist leaders, and to work closely with and follow the advice and guidance of dedicated communists.”

 

Based on this statement, Hoover justified intense FBI spying on Dr. King, including bugging his hotel rooms and reporting on his sexual activities and those of his associates. And I read and faithfully fully summarized and delivered to the president each and every such Hoover document.

 

Much later, after I left the White House, I became aware of Hoover’s almost psychotic personal obsession with and hatred of Dr. King, and, most importantly, the falsity of his assertions that Dr. King was in any way disloyal or either a communist or a follower of communism. Nor was I aware of Director Hoover’s personal peccadillos that likely led him to those perversions of the truth. But, to my everlasting regret, at the time that I read and forwarded Hoover’s diatribes to the president, I accepted them as being the truth.





It was a late fall day and the president had summoned some of his staff to meet with him in the Cabinet room. There were 15 or so of us who constituted his personal assistants. I happened to be one of them, although I was pretty low on the totem pole of importance. 

 

What I remember most about that meeting was what the president brought up at its end. He began by bemoaning what he described as the “lack of insight” in the many reports he received concerning what was going in the nation’s Black ghettos.

 

“I don’t really know which of my programs are working and which are not — and why.” He went on, “I keep hearing about ‘Black Power.’ What is that all about?”

 

He continued in this vein for a while before he came to his point: “I have all these so-called experts and I’m loaded with their reports. But what I want is something entirely different. I want to hear from non-experts, from people who bring fresh, unspoiled views, and that means from one or more of you sitting in this room. I want you to go out and live in the ghettos for a time, and that doesn’t mean commuting from some hotel. Walk the streets, talk to as many people as possible, look at every one of my programs, and then come back and report about everything you saw and learned.”

 

When the meeting ended, I was the only one to follow the president back to the Oval Office. I told him I wanted to volunteer, and he was pleased. “Now, remember,” he said, “do NOT get into trouble. Do NOT get your name in the papers. NOBODY is to know you came from here.” “Yes, sir,” I replied, “but can you give me some guidance as to how I am to manage that?” Laughing, the president said, “I thought you were a bright young man. I’m sure you can figure all that out on your own.” And I was dismissed.

 

Returning to my office, I knew the only way I could even approach what the president needed was to find someone — an African American — to accompany me into America’s Black ghettos. But, I am mortified to say, I knew no one like that. However, I knew someone who did, one of my closest friends, Nick Kotz, a Washington reporter who often wrote about inner-city problems. Nick came introduced me to Ken Vallis, an African American born and raised in Chicago’s South Side ghetto who by dint of his own fine intelligence had left all that behind and was now a trusted employee of the U.S. Department of Labor.

 

Kenny was my age, and we instantly bonded. He eagerly accepted my invitation and, together, over the next 15 months, he and I lived and worked the president’s expressed wishes for periods of time in the ghettos of Chicago and Oakland. We lived in rooming houses, talked to people day and night, examined as many programs as possible, and, for me, absorbed the reality of inner-city life.

 

The president liked his memos short; one page was ideal. But returning from my first sojourn in Chicago, I was so full of impressions and thoughts that I couldn’t stop writing. In the end, my report covered seven single-spaced pages, but I couldn’t bring myself to cut any of it. So, with great trepidation, I submitted it to the president, fully expecting to be thoroughly dressed down.

 

But that didn’t happen. Instead, he was delighted and, I discovered, used my report as a tool. I remember how pleased I was when one day in the Cabinet Room, he pulled my memo out from his suit pocket and read parts of it to some congressmen in an effort to sway them regarding pending civil rights legislation.




After I left the White House, Kenny Vallis and I remained friends. From time to time, we would meet for lunch and, because we both loved the game, would spend an hour or so playing squash.

 

Because the two of us were also friends with Nick Kotz — by then a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter with the Washington Post — we would see each other at Nick’s home. It was there that our friendship came to an abrupt end.

 

Hoover's vendetta against Dr. King had become public knowledge — and drew widespread condemnation. As Nick, Ken, and I were discussing it, I casually mentioned that one of my jobs had been to read his reports. Kenny’s reaction was immediate, and angry. “Why didn’t you object?” he demanded. “Why didn’t you do something — like resign?” He would not accept my explanation that back then, I naively believed everything Hoover and the FBI submitted. I tried and tried, but I could not satisfy him.

 

In the end, Kenny would hear no more, and abruptly left Nick’s house. He never spoke to me again, and I forever lost a friend.

 

 

Sherwin Markman, a graduate of the Yale Law School, lives with his wife, Kathryn (Peggy) in Rock Hall, Maryland. He served as an assistant to President Lyndon Johnson, after which was a trial lawyer in Washington, D.C. He has published several books, including one dealing with the Electoral College. He has also taught and lectured about the American political system.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By CSES Staff October 1, 2025
Heavily dependent on international students working under the J-1 visa program, Ocean City’s seasonal restaurants face a new difficulty after federal policy changes under the Trump administration. Each summer, roughly 3,300 J-1 visa holders arrive in Ocean City to help fill more than 12,000 seasonal jobs, according to the Maryland Restaurant Association. Many of these restaurant workers handle everything from cooking to serving customers. The U.S. State Department identifies Ocean City as the nation’s top destination for summer work travel exchange visitors. This year, the program was paused and later reinstated with new restrictions and federal investigations, which disrupted hiring and complicated staffing for the 2025 season. Nearly 60% of Worcester County voters supported Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. Now, however, restaurant owners who backed Trump are confronted with the consequences of his administration’s visa policies, which threaten the flow of international workers upon which they rely. The disruption has led to worker shortages, operational difficulties, and uncertainty about future seasons. Restaurants that depend on J-1 students to meet demand during peak tourist months are preparing for further complications as federal reviews of visa programs continue. Local economic leaders warn that without these workers, Ocean City’s seasonal businesses could struggle to stay afloat. For restaurant owners and community members who overwhelmingly supported Trump, the new reality has raised questions about the resort town’s current workforce model under tighter immigration policies.
By Jan Plotczyk October 1, 2025
Poverty in Maryland’s First Congressional District will increase because of the GOP’s budget reconciliation bill— the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” — that was narrowly passed in July. Rep. Andrew P. Harris (R-MD01) voted to pass that wildly unpopular bill and to kick our neighbors off SNAP and Medicaid to give tax cuts to billionaires. That was a cruel choice. More of his constituents will be living in poverty because of the OBBBA’s cuts to programs that support people’s basic needs. Poverty Rates in Maryland’s First Congressional District The official poverty rate for MD-01 has hovered between 8.5% and 9.8% for the last seven years. (Poverty rates for congressional districts were not calculated for 2020 due to the pandemic.) In 2024, 72,800 of our neighbors were living in poverty.
By Jan Plotczyk October 1, 2025
President Trump has recently realized — apparently — that his One Big Beautiful Bill Act is not universally beloved by the American people. Aside from GOP lawmakers, billionaires, and MAGA faithful, the measure has never enjoyed the support of anyone. Polling conducted up to the bill’s passage, and analyzed by G. Elliott Morris , showed that On average across pollsters and methods, 31% of Americans support the One Big Beautiful Bill, while 54% oppose it. That net rating of -23 is, to put it mildly, abysmal… [H]aving a majority against you with just a third in support is terrible! And the bill has not become any more popular since its passage. But instead of fixing the parts of the bill that average people detest — the cuts to social programs for families, the extended tax cuts for billionaires — Trump has decided to just rebrand the bill as something he thinks they’ll love. And having decided that a public relations fix is all that’s needed, the White House has told GOP legislators that the bill shall now be known as the Working Families Tax Cut Bill. What tax cuts for working Americans are in the bill? Tax credits. The bill includes modest increases in the Child Tax Credit and Child and Dependent Care Credit. The standard tax deduction. The bill increases the standard tax deduction for individuals by $750 and for couples by $1,500. The no-tax-on-tips provision. Trump touts this as a true working-class tax cut. But it does not benefit many because only 3% of workers earn tips, and one-third of those earn too little to pay federal taxes. The no-tax-on-overtime-pay provision. This sounds good, but the no-tax applies only to the “half” portion of time-and-a-half pay. If a worker earns $20/hour regular pay and $30/hour overtime pay, the first $20/hour of overtime pay is taxed; only the $10/hour of premium pay is not taxed. It is estimated that for the bottom 40% of workers by income, this will equate to a tax savings of $10/year. Those meager offerings cannot obscure the fact that the bill gives 45% of the tax cuts to the wealthy ; only 1% of the tax cuts go to the lowest fifth of wage earners. To pay for those tax cuts for the wealthy, the bill contains $1.4 trillion in benefits cuts that will affect lower income Americans: many millions will lose health insurance coverage, food assistance, and federal student financial aid. Any small tax benefit that accrues to lower income Americans from the OBBBA is more than offset by benefit losses and Trump’s new tariffs (a defacto sales tax). The Yale Budget Lab found that when one combines the effects of Trump’s tariffs and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, 90% of American families will end up worse off. Seventy per cent of households will face losses ranging from $780 to $2,570 each year. So, don’t be conned. Recognize Trump’s gaslighting for what it is, a desperate attempt to mislead and deceive the American people. Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.
By CSES Staff October 1, 2025
Before a crowd at Burnish Brewing Company, Wicomico County Councilman Josh Hastings, a Democrat, launched his campaign for the Maryland House of Delegates in District 38B, setting up what is expected to be one of the most competitive races in the state in 2026. The seat is held by GOP Del. Barry Glassman, who was appointed after former Del. Carl Anderton accepted a position in the Wes Moore administration. Although Glassman begins the campaign with more than $30,000 in campaign funds and will run as the incumbent, the district — with a +7 advantage for Democrats — is considered a top pickup opportunity for House Democrats in Annapolis. Having grown up on Maryland’s first certified organic poultry farm in Mardela Springs, Hastings has built a career at the intersection of agriculture, environmental sustainability, and land use. Before gaining elected office, he spent 15 years in state and local policy and nonprofit leadership positions, including as executive director of Forever Maryland, a statewide nonprofit focused on conserving farms, forests, parks, and critical habitats. Since joining the County Council, Hastings has established himself as a productive legislator, and is credited with: Converting Pirate’s Wharf into a public park. Securing $200 million in county budget commitments for Salisbury firefighters. Advancing a countywide water and sewer master plan. Ensuring consistent above-maintenance-of-effort funding for Wicomico public schools. Championing major upgrades to parks and recreation facilities. He has also worked to: Expand pickleball opportunities at Harmon Field Park. Secure a new middle and high school in Mardela Springs. Address invasive species management. Public safety and quality of life have been recurring themes in his tenure, with Hastings backing investments in first responders and cleaner, healthier communities. Colleagues often note his ability to foster civil, thoughtful debate on complex issues. Hastings is no stranger to Annapolis. Earlier in his career, he served as an aide to Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee Chair Joan Carter Conway, where he wrote and helped to pass legislation reduce concussions in youth sports. On the campaign trail, Hastings emphasizes a platform focused on opportunity, affordability, and quality of life on the Shore. His priorities include: Creating more well-paying jobs that build on the region’s strengths while opening doors in growing industries Strengthening public schools with smaller class sizes and stronger pathways from arts to trades to higher education Tackling the housing shortage with more options for residents of all ages and abilities He also pledges to lower the cost of living by advocating for fair wages and more affordable essentials, such as food, energy, and housing. Hastings emphasizes community health and safety as central to his vision, with a focus on increasing access to health care, broadband, transportation, and recreational spaces. His platform stresses the need to protect the Shore’s clean water and healthy land while supporting farmers and a resource-based economy. At the heart of his message is a call for fairness and opportunity, and a government that works for everyday people rather than the few. His announcement also came with personal news: Hastings and his wife Alyssa are expecting their first child in April. With deep local roots, a track record of legislative success, and a competitive district in play, Hastings’ campaign launch signals that Democrats view District 38B as a pivotal race in the 2026 election cycle.
By CSES Staff October 1, 2025
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Housing and Community Development Sec. Jacob Day were on Smith Island Sept. 24 to mark completion of an infrastructure milestone, the island’s first connection to high-speed internet. Funded by state grants, the $2 million broadband project was completed two months ahead of schedule, and will provide reliable internet access to residents, businesses, and schools on the island, where less than full connectivity has been a long-standing problem. Moore is the first governor to visit Smith Island since 1999, underscoring the administration’s focus on reaching often-overlooked communities. Residents welcomed the infrastructure improvement, noting that high-speed internet can enhance education, healthcare access, small business growth, and overall quality of life. Moore, a Democrat, has made broadband access a central part of his infrastructure agenda, with similar projects underway in other rural parts of the state. For Smith Island, this connection represents a long-awaited lifeline to the wider world, and a signal that Maryland’s leaders are paying attention.
By CSES Staff October 1, 2025
Wicomico County Councilman James Winn (R-At Large) drew criticism at the Sept. 16 council meeting because of his extended religious rant that included pulling out a Bible and declaring he would “pray for non-Christians” in the wake of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk’s shooting death. During the meeting’s public remarks portion, Winn shifted from county business to a sermon-like address. He held up a Bible, quoted passages, and suggested that residents who do not identify as Christians need his prayers and guidance. Winn tied his comments to the recent death of Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, framing it as a moment for Wicomico residents to recommit to Christian values. Several attendees called the outburst inappropriate for a public governmental meeting, noting that Winn blurred the line between his own religious faith and his role as an elected official. Critics argued the comments excluded non-Christian residents and showed a lack of respect for the county’s religious diversity. The council meeting continued after Winn’s remarks. Still, the episode has drawn sharp reactions on social media, with some residents calling the behavior “embarrassing” and “unbecoming of an elected leader.” Others are defending Winn, saying he was exercising his free speech and sharing a message of faith in a difficult moment. Council leadership did not formally intercede during the meeting. However, community members are suggesting that the county ought to adopt clear standards to prevent religious proselytizing during official sessions. The controversy arises as Wicomico County confronts pressing local issues, including land use debates and the fallout from its immigration enforcement partnership with ICE. For some residents, Winn’s comments were perceived as a distraction from the county's real work of governance.
Show More