Owners of Enslaved Persons on the Eastern Shore Who Served in the Maryland Legislature and in the U.S. Congress, Part 2

George Shivers • March 29, 2022

Excerpt from list of birthdates and deathdates of enslaved people. Image: Maryland State Archives


Part 1 of this series focused on owners of enslaved people in the lower Eastern Shore counties, Wicomico, Somerset, and Worcester, and who served in the state or federal legislatures. Part 2 considers five of the 12 enslavers who were also legislators and who resided in the Mid-Shore counties of Dorchester and Talbot:

 

        1. Charles Goldsborough (1765-1834), Dorchester

        2. Robert Henry Goldsborough (1779-1836), Talbot

        3. William Hayward, Jr. (1787-1836), Talbot

        4. Daniel Maynadier Henry (1823-1899), Dorchester

        5. Thomas Holiday Hicks (1798-1865), Dorchester

        6. William Hindman (1743-1822), Talbot

        7. John Leeds Kerr (1780-1844), Talbot

        8. Edward Lloyd (1779-1834), Talbot

        9. Robert Nichols Martin (1798-1870), Dorchester

        10. William Vans Murray (1760-1803), Dorchester

        11. Richard Spencer (1796-1868), Talbot

        12. Philip Francis Thomas (181-1890), Talbot

 

The names of these politicians are taken from a Washington Post project to identify enslavers.


Charles Goldsborough. Image: Wikimedia Commons


Charles Goldsborough

 

Charles Goldsborough was born at “Hunting Creek” near Cambridge in Dorchester County. He graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1784 was admitted to the Maryland bar in 1790. After holding several local offices, he served as a member of the state senate from 1791 to 1795 and 1799 to 1801.

 

He was elected as a Federalist to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1805 and served five consecutive terms until 1817. Goldsborough was also governor of Maryland in 1818-19. He retired from public life in 1820 to “Shoal Creek,” his country estate near Cambridge, and died there in 1834. He was interred in Christ Episcopal Church Cemetery in Cambridge.

 

Goldsborough was a major owner of enslaved men, women, and children. According to the federal census of 1830, Goldsborough held 116 people in bondage on his estate: 33 boys and young men; 16 men; 2 older men; 34 girls and young women; 16 women; 5 older women; and 10 of unknown ages.



Thomas Holliday Hicks. Image: Maryland State Archives


Thomas Holliday Hicks

 

Born in East New Market, Dorchester County, Hicks began his political career as a constable in his hometown. A Democrat, he was then elected as the county sheriff. He then joined the Whig party and was elected to the Maryland House of Delegates in 1830 and re-elected in 1836.

 

In 1838, he was appointed register of wills for Dorchester County, the position he held until he was elected as governor in 1858. By then, the Whigs had disintegrated and he joined the Native American Party, more commonly known as the “Know-Nothings.” That election was notably corrupt, including open intimidation of voters and major violence.

 

In his inaugural address as governor, Hicks criticized the number of immigrants entering the country, claiming they would change the national character. He opposed the abolitionists, denouncing “the attacks of fanatical and misguided persons against property in slaves” and insisting that owners of enslaved people had a right under the constitution to recover their property.

 

In December 1862, his successor as governor appointed him to the U.S. Senate to complete the term of James A. Pearce, who had died. Hicks died in Washington D.C. in 1865 and was buried on the family farm in Dorchester County. His remains were later disinterred and moved to Cambridge Cemetery. The state placed a monument on his grave in 1868.

 

Hicks owned fewer enslaved persons than Goldsborough, a total of eight according to the 1840 federal census, including one boy, one man, two women, and four of unknown ages.

 

William Hindman. Image: Wikipedia


William Hindman

 

William Hindman was born in Dorchester County, but later lived in Talbot, where his father owned a plantation. He studied law at the Inns of Court in London, England, returning home in 1765. He was admitted to the Maryland bar and practiced in Talbot County.

 

He served in Maryland’s revolutionary government from 1775 to 1777 and as state treasurer for the Eastern Shore. He resigned that post when he was elected to the state senate in 1777, where he served until 1784. Maryland sent him as a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1785 and 1786.

 

From 1789 to 1792, Hindman served on the governor’s executive council. In the latter year, voters returned him to the state senate, from which he was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives that same year after the resignation of Joshua Seney (another Eastern Shore enslaver from Queen Anne’s County). He served in the House until 1799. When Maryland’s U.S. Senator James Lloyd resigned in 1800, Hindman was named to finish his term, which ran until 1801. In the Senate, he was aligned with the Whigs. He died in Baltimore in 1822, and is buried in St. Paul’s Burial Ground.

 

The number of enslaved persons that Hindman held increased over the years. In 1790, he owned six, but by 1820, the total was 86, broken down as follows: 23 boys and young men; 23 men; 16 girls and young women; and 24 women.

 

John Leeds Kerr. Image: National Gallery of Art


John Leeds Kerr

 

Kerr was born in 1780 near Annapolis, graduated from St. John’s College in 1795, and was admitted to the Maryland bar in 1801. He moved to Easton and practiced law there. He served as deputy state’s attorney for Talbot County from 1806 until 1810.

 

After commanding a company of militia during the War of 1812, in 1817 he was appointed as Maryland’s agent to press claims against the federal government that grew out of that war. Kerr was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1824 and served there until 1829. He was reelected to Congress in 1830 and served until 1833.

 

Kerr served as a presidential elector on the Whig ticket in 1840. He was elected as a Whig to the U.S. Senate in 1841 to complete the term of John S. Spence (also an Eastern Shore enslaver), who died in office. He served in the Senate from 1841 to 1843. Kerr died in Easton in 1844 and is interred in the Bozman family cemetery at “Bellville,” near Oxford Neck in Talbot County.

 

In 1820, Kerr owned six enslaved persons: one boy; two men; one girl; and two women. Twenty years later, the number of people he held in bondage had increased to 25: eight boys and young men; five men; one older man; six girls and young women; and five women.



Edward Lloyd

 

Edward Lloyd, another citizen of Talbot County and the owner of Wye House plantation, owned by far the largest number of enslaved people in this group. He served as the 13th governor of Maryland and was a U.S. senator and a member of the House of Representatives.

 

He was also the owner of the most famous man who escaped slavery on the Eastern Shore — Frederick Douglass — who achieved national and international fame. Lloyd held 30 people in slavery in 1790, but by 1830, four years before his death, there were 440 men, women, and children in his possession.

 

We can see a few commonalities among the enslavers on the mid-Shore. All were major landowners, all practiced law in their communities, and all had the wealth and the time to devote themselves to careers in politics, while their households and lands were cared for by the enslaved.

 

 

Sources:

"More than 1700 congressmen once enslaved Black people. This is who they were, and how they shaped the nation." Julie Zauzmer Weil, Adrian Blanco, and Leo Dominguez. Washington Post, Jan. 10, 2022.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/interactive/2022/congress-slaveowners-names-list/?itid=ap_juliezauzmerweil


Ancestry

https://www.ancestry.com/search/

 

Wikipedia, Charles Goldsborough

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Goldsborough

 

Wikipedia, Thomas Holliday Hicks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Holliday_Hicks

 

Wikipedia, William Hindman

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hindman

 

Wikipedia, John Leeds Kerr

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Leeds_Kerr

 

Wikipedia, Edward Lloyd

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Lloyd_(Governor_of_Maryland)

 

Wikipedia, Life and Times of Frederick Douglass

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Life_and_Times_of_Frederick_Douglass_(1892)_p71.png

 

 

A native of Wicomico County, George Shivers holds a doctorate from the University of Maryland and taught in the Foreign Language Dept. of Washington College for 38 years before retiring in 2007. He is also very interested in the history and culture of the Eastern Shore, African American history in particular.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Megan Outten Launches Campaign for Wicomico County Council, District 7

By Friends of Megan Outten • July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com

“Turtles All The Way Down”

By John Christie • July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.

“Andy Harris Just Made the Most Dangerous Vote of His Career”

By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co • July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017

How Many Will Be Kicked Off Medicaid in MD-01 Because of Andy Harris?

By Jan Plotczyk • July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.

Six Reasons Why the House Budget Bill Will Hurt Rural America

By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser • May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.

Who Will SNAP Cuts Affect in Maryland? On the Eastern Shore?

By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities • May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More