Queen Anne’s County Takes Big Step in Solar

Linda G. Weimer • August 16, 2022


Queen Anne’s County’s newest and largest solar farm is a big step toward clean energy in Maryland. For nearby residents, however, Bluegrass Solar is a regrettable loss of valuable soils and familiar countryside. But to those charged with promoting the broad public interest, it’s not a case of black and white, good and bad, but a balanced innovation.

 

Bluegrass Solar is racing to complete its new solar array on 320 acres of the 500-acre Knight farm, whose family members signed 25-year leases with developers to bring it about, with options for 10 more years. About eight miles southeast of Chestertown, the facility in the north end of Queen Anne’s is bounded by John Powell, Pondtown, Sheriff Meredith, Bowers, and Ewingtown roads. The property measures 4.5 miles around.

 

This project should be cheering environmentalists eager to slow global warming by adding an 80 megawatt (MW) no-emission generator to the regional grid. The delivery takes place via an on-site substation directly to a high-voltage Delmarva Power transmission line that passes above the property. Once all the facility’s 188,000 solar panels are online, Bluegrass electricity should power 64,000 homes. That would rank Bluegrass second in the state to Great Bay Solar, with 145 MWs in Somerset County.

 

With the passage in April of Maryland’s Climate Solutions Now Act, the state set itself a goal of reducing greenhouse gasses by 60 percent of the 2006 level by 2031. By 2050, the Act says, the state should be emitting zero heat holding gas. Even as environmentalists, such as the Maryland League of Conservation Voters, praise the Act as the most ambitious of any state, others see it as unfeasible. Reasons are obvious: As of early 2022, PJM (a regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity) had a backlog of over 800 proposed renewable projects to review, some waiting for two years. Further, the biggest share of heat-trapping emissions in the state comes not from power plants, but from cars, trucks, and other motor vehicles.

 

With state and federal tax incentives and the decreasing costs of solar panels, solar developers are finally enjoying a boom, and with its flat terrain, Maryland’s Eastern Shore is a draw.

 


Bluegrass’ senior project manager, Jay Marx of Narenco, Inc., of Charlotte, N.C., sounded enthusiastic as he talked about the many subcontractors — up to 280 workers on site per day — aimed at delivering Bluegrass on time.

 

After weeks of testing, Bluegrass should be fully engaged by Thanksgiving, he said. The builders are made up of solar professionals, firms that put in bids and “travel the country from job to job,” some sinking steel posts that anchor the rows of panels, others attaching plywood-sized, 4x8 foot solar panels. “The money’s really good too,” he added.

 

The payment to farmers is also good. Sources set the average at $1,000 per acre per year, considerably more than the average profit from farming, and without labor, expenses, and the uncertainties of weather and markets. 

 

“I’m trying to reach the schools, get them to take a field trip, so they can see what solar is all about,” Marx added. A feature of Bluegrass’s design is panels that move; since about 2018, most ground-mounted panels track the angle of sunlight, boosting power about 30 percent.

 

The grays — the mix of pros and cons in the project — are noted by people such as County Commissioner Jack Wilson (whose District 1 includes the Knight property), the QA Board of Appeals, and Amy Moredock, planning director for Queen Anne’s County.

 

Wilson says he and others fought off utility-scale solar proposals for at least five years. Since then, court decisions have established that Maryland counties face severe threats of lost autonomy in their planning and zoning roles if they reject projects approved by the Maryland Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities in the state. That commission has also been charged with increasing the number of renewable (solar and wind) power facilities in operation.

 

“We have to play nice in the Public Service Commission sandbox,” Wilson said. Public hearings on those failed projects were attended by huge crowds, he noted, and at that time, such political pressure was sufficient to dissuade the commission. Today, backed by case law, it can act more independently.

 

Wilson said the danger to the county’s authority was worse than utility-scale solar in an agricultural area. Under the county zoning code, solar projects are a conditional use allowed in areas zoned agriculture or countryside. They must be approved by the County Board of Appeals. Bluegrass was approved with many stipulations by a 2-to-1 vote. The county commissioners had no vote on it.

 

Still, Wilson said Bluegrass riled enough District 1 residents that he faced an anti-Bluegrass challenger in the July 19 Republican primary and won by only 38 votes out of 5,430 cast. The position of commissioner pays $25,000 annually.

 

Twelve nearby residents almost unanimously opposed the project during the June 2019 public hearings by the Board of Appeals, fewer at local hearings by the Public Service Commission. There are about 20 properties adjacent to the solar field’s 4.5-mile boundary, most on Ewingtown Road.

 

Residents objected to potential storm run-off, the area’s lost rural character, and more cumbersome operations for surrounding farms. They also predicted a severe impact on the area’s migrating waterfowl.

 

The loss of 500 acres of forage and roosting space would also mean the loss of autumn income to hunting outfitters and guides, who are often farmers in summer, several testified. The developer provided a retired state wildfowl expert who disputed that prediction since local ponds remain. But the remarks of the local hunting faction bore heavily on the “No” vote from the Appeals Board’s then-chair, Kenneth Scott. He wrote, “I think the evidence establishes beyond any doubt the significance of waterfowl and hunting to this neighborhood.”

 

Scott was outvoted by board members Craig McGinnes and Bill Moore. They noted it made sense to put the installation where high-voltage lines pass overhead in accordance with the county’s ‘utility solar overlay’ district created in late 2017. That law confines such projects to within two miles of transmission lines. The measure sought to prevent disturbing a wider area as building underground connections from distant solar sites would have done.

 

Then in September 2019, the Public Service Commission added its stamp of approval, granting Bluegrass a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Reviews and some additional requirements were set forth by state agencies covering archeologic and historic properties (none known on site); avoidance of woods and wetlands (standards met); protecting soil, air and water qualities and threatened fresh-water mussels nearby; and preserving a pleasant view through landscaping a buffer strip.

 

Amy Moredock, the county’s planning director, echoed Wilson’s and the Appeals Board’s and Commission’s views. She emphasized the scrutiny that Bluegrass has received and will continue to receive. The goal is to ensure the operator follows the many environmental details in their license, which include posting bond to ensure total removal of all equipment within 12 months after the facility reaches the end of its useful life, generally around 25 years. 

 

While under construction, the site is regularly visited by the county’s zoning and public works staff, Moredock said. Wilson said he was notified of storm run-off by neighbors, which resulted in orders to repair silt fences. Residents have already called with concerns about the prescribed variety of plants, mostly native species, going in the vegetation buffer.

 

The mix of trees and shrubs was designed by Moredock’s predecessor, Michael Wisnosky. At Bluegrass, using a state incentive, clear areas and spaces among the panels will be seeded as meadows to encourage insect pollinators, now in worrisome decline. Some studies indicate such untilled meadows over several decades may leave soils healthier than farming them.

 

Moredock summed up the situation: “Every county in Maryland has a role to play in supporting the state’s clean energy goals. But we have to be clear that agricultural land is not unused land, not vacant land up for grabs.”

 

 

Linda G. Weimer retired from full-time news reporting in 2009 after three years with the Sun Media Group's suburban Baltimore weeklies. As a freelancer, her work has appeared in more than a dozen regional and national publications, including The Washington Post, Sierra Magazine, Seafood Leader, and the New York Times.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More