Redistricting Group Releases Draft Congressional Maps

Allison Mollenkamp, Capital News Service • November 23, 2021

2011 Map: Maryland's existing congressional map went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Districts are color-coded

and county lines are shown in black. Maryland Department of Planning.


Update: The Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission voted on Nov. 23 to recommend a plan similar to Plan 2 (see maps below) to the Maryland General Assembly, as reported by Maryland Matters.


The Maryland General Assembly’s redistricting group released four draft congressional maps on Nov. 9, but critics say these maps show signs of continued gerrymandering.

 

The Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission (LRAC), established earlier this year by the legislature’s Democratic leadership, released the maps days after the state’s other redistricting commission delivered its maps to Gov. Larry Hogan (R).

 

The Maryland Citizens Redistricting commission was appointed by Hogan and presented its proposed congressional and state legislative maps to him earlier.

 

The citizens commission was made up of three Democrats, three Republicans, and three unaffiliated voters.

 

LRAC included four Democratic members of the legislature and two Republican members, and was chaired by Karl Aro, who formerly led the Department of Legislative Services.

 

In a statement on Nov. 10, Hogan shared his displeasure with the draft maps from the legislative commission, while touting the map delivered to him by the citizens commission as fair and not drawn by “partisan politicians.”

 

When the LRAC maps were released, Senate President Bill Ferguson and House Speaker Adrienne Jones issued a joint statement.

 

“We are pleased that LRAC is releasing four draft congressional maps now, providing the public with several weeks for input and reaction,” Ferguson and Jones wrote.

 

Maps from both commissions are expected to be considered in a special session of the General Assembly starting Dec. 6.

 

In a letter released with the maps, Aro wrote that the maps “to the extent practicable, keep Marylanders in their existing districts. Portions of these districts have remained intact for at least 30 years and reflect a commitment to following the Voting Rights Act [of 1965], protecting existing communities of interest, and utilizing existing natural and political boundaries.”

 

Aro went on seemingly to  acknowledge criticism of the congressional lines drawn in 2011, which went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that partisan gerrymandering is a political question “beyond the reach of the federal courts.”

 

“It is our sincere intention to dramatically improve upon our current map,” Aro wrote.

 

Those two intentions might be in conflict, according to Beth Hufnagel, who heads the redistricting team for the League of Women Voters of Maryland.

 

“I’m struggling a little bit with those two goals,” Hufnagel said.

 

Critics say improving upon a gerrymandered map doesn’t mean the drafts are perfect.

 

“The map beforehand was nationally recognized as one of the most gerrymandered maps in the country, so almost anything that isn’t as bad is better.”

 

That’s according to Todd Eberly, an associate professor of political science and public policy at St. Mary’s College of Maryland.

 

“This is what happens when you already have a pretty serious gerrymander, but you know that you’re under greater scrutiny because more people are paying attention,” Eberly said.

 

Eberly told Capital News Service that he believes the legislative commission wanted to make a map that looked “better” or less gerrymandered, while prioritizing protecting Democratic incumbents in Congress and maintaining partisan advantage.

 

The legislative commission’s four proposed maps vary in their treatment of different areas of the state, with noticeable potential changes to District 1, where Rep. Andrew P. Harris is the only Republican member of Maryland’s congressional delegation.

 

Eberly said two of the draft maps could change the partisan balance of the Eastern Shore district.

 

“I think both of the maps that take the first district and bring it across the bridge and into Anne Arundel County make the first district a much more competitive district, if not a district that actually favors a Democrat slightly,” Eberly said.

 

Eberly also pointed to Districts 3, 4, and 7, which he said, “continue to be pretty serious gerrymanders.”

 

District 2, according to Eberly, has been “cleaned up a little bit,” in some of the draft maps.

 

Cleaning up the map may not have gone far enough, according to Helen Brewer, a legal analyst with the non-partisan Princeton Gerrymandering Project.

 

“The shapes of the districts are definitely less compact” than those in the maps released by the citizens commission, Brewer said.

 

Of course, the shape of congressional districts isn’t the only way to evaluate whether gerrymandering has occurred.

 

Brewer said, “people in Maryland really are of course the experts on their own state,” and can evaluate how the proposed district lines interact with different cities and counties.

 

Geographic features like rivers and mountains can lead to districts that look odd on paper but keep communities of interest together, Brewer added.

 

LRAC worked to give different communities an opportunity to advocate for themselves in the map drawing process by holding meetings around the state.

 

Hufnagel, with the League of Women voters, said while she can’t point to specific examples from the wide range of speakers at the public meetings, “they have incorporated some testimony into their map choices.”

 

The presence of choices is both a positive and a negative for Hufnagel; she thinks having more than one option for now will be good, while the commission can take public input.

 

“We do hope… that they can narrow it down to one at the beginning of December,” Hufnagel said.

 

The differences between the citizens commission and legislative commission maps could come down to makeup of the commissions.

 

Brewer said the Princeton Gerrymandering Project generally prefers to see maps drawn by commissions independent of state legislatures.

 

The gerrymandering project scores maps based on partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features. They have not yet released grades for the legislative commission’s maps.

 

 “Any time that legislators are involved in drawing maps … across both sides of the aisle, they are going to be incentivized to keep themselves or their party in power,” Brewer said.

 

Brewer said the citizens commission maps scored well on partisan fairness, which she said is consistent with maps from independent commissions.

 

“Those maps are not guaranteed to be the ones that will be enacted into law,” Brewer said.

 

Democrats hold a supermajority in the legislature, where the LRAC's maps may be more likely to pass.

 

More input on the maps is likely on the way.

 

Common Cause Maryland, a government watchdog group, said in a statement they are working with partner organizations to evaluate the draft maps based on their “impact on the voting power of historically marginalized Maryland communities, as well as partisan fairness, and traditional redistricting criteria.”

 

Federal law directs how states are able to consider race when drawing congressional maps.

 

Common Cause added it hopes the legislature will release updated reopening guidelines for the upcoming special session.

 

“We urge legislators to continue to make the redistricting process open and transparent by ensuring the session is accessible.”

 

The special session will include consideration of congressional maps.

 

State legislative and Senate districts are expected to be considered during the regular session in 2022.

 

The citizens commission presented draft state-level maps to the governor; the legislative commission has only released congressional drafts.

 

 

Draft Maps (click on LRAC maps for interactive version):

LRAC Map 1: Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission Draft Map 1. Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission.


LRAC Map 2: Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission Draft Map 2. Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission.


LRAC Map 3: Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission Draft Map 3. Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission.


LRAC Map 4: Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission Draft Map 4. Legislative Redistricting Advisory Commission.


MCRC Map: The Maryland Citizens Redistricting Commission submitted this draft congressional map

to Gov. Larry Hogan (R). Maryland Citizens Redistricting Commission.




Capital News Service is a student-powered news organization run by the University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism. For 26 years, they have provided deeply reported, award-winning coverage of issues of import to Marylanders.


Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
By Jan Plotczyk May 21, 2025
Apparently, some people think that the GOP’s “big beautiful bill” is a foregone conclusion, and that the struggle over the budget and Trump’s agenda is over and done. Not true. On Sunday night, the bill — given the alternate name “Big Bad Bullsh*t Bill” by the Democratic Women’s Caucus — was voted out of the House Budget Committee. The GOP plan is to pass this legislation in the House before Memorial Day. But that’s not the end of it. As Jessica Craven explained in her Chop Wood Carry Water column: “Remember, we have at least six weeks left in this process. The bill has to: Pass the House, Then head to the Senate where it will likely be rewritten almost completely, Then be passed there, Then be brought back to the House for reconciliation, And then, if the House changes that version at all, Go back to the Senate for another vote.” She adds, “Every step of that process is a place for us to kill it.” The bill is over a thousand pages long, and the American people will not get a chance to read it until it has passed the House. But, thanks to 5Calls , we know it includes:
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress May 13, 2025
Let's talk about our Eastern Shore Delegation, the representatives who are supposed to fight for our nine Shore counties in Annapolis, and what they actually got up to this session.
By Markus Schmidt, Virginia Mercury May 12, 2025
For the first time in recent memory, Virginia Democrats have candidates running in all 100 House of Delegates districts — a milestone party leaders and grassroots organizers say reflects rising momentum as President Donald Trump’s second term continues to galvanize opposition.
Shore Progress logo
By Jared Schablein, Shore Progress April 22, 2025
The 447th legislative session of the Maryland General Assembly adjourned on April 8. This End of Session Report highlights the work Shore Progress has done to fight for working families and bring real results home to the Shore. Over the 90-day session, lawmakers debated 1,901 bills and passed 878 into law. Shore Progress and members supported legislation that delivers for the Eastern Shore, protecting our environment, expanding access to housing and healthcare, strengthening workers’ rights, and more. Shore Progress Supported Legislation By The Numbers: Over 60 pieces of our backed legislation were passed. Another 15 passed in one Chamber but not the other. Legislation details are below, past the budget section. The 2026 Maryland State Budget How We Got Here: Maryland’s budget problems didn’t start overnight. They began under Governor Larry Hogan. Governor Hogan expanded the state budget yearly but blocked the legislature from moving money around or making common-sense changes. Instead of fixing the structural issues, Hogan used federal covid relief funds to hide the cracks and drained our state’s savings from $5.5 billion to $2.3 billion to boost his image before leaving office. How Trump/Musk Made It Worse: Maryland is facing a new fiscal crisis driven by the Trump–Musk administration, whose trade wars, tariff policies, and deep federal cuts have hit us harder than most, costing the state over 30,000 jobs, shuttering offices, and erasing promised investments. A University of Maryland study estimates Trump’s tariffs alone could cost us $2 billion, and those federal cuts have already added $300 million to our budget deficit. Covid aid gave us a short-term boost and even created a fake surplus under Hogan, but that money is gone, while housing, healthcare, and college prices keep rising. The Trump–Musk White House is only making things worse by slashing funding, gutting services, and eliminating research that Marylanders rely on. How The State Budget Fixes These Issues: This year, Maryland faced a $3 billion budget gap, and the General Assembly fixed it with a smart mix of cuts and fair new revenue, while protecting working families, schools, and health care. The 2025 Budget cuts $1.9 billion ($400 million less than last year) without gutting services people rely on. The General Assembly raised $1.2 billion in fair new revenue, mostly from the wealthiest Marylanders. The Budget ended with a $350 million surplus, plus $2.4 billion saved in the Rainy Day Fund (more than 9% of general fund revenue), which came in $7 million above what the Spending Affordability Committee called for. The budget protects funding for our schools, health care, transit, and public workers. The budget delivers real wins: $800 million more annually for transit and infrastructure, plus $500 million for long-term transportation needs. It invests $9.7 billion in public schools and boosts local education aid by $572.5 million, a 7% increase. If current revenue trends hold, no new taxes will be needed next session. Even better, 94% of Marylanders will see a tax cut or no change, while only the wealthiest 5% will finally pay their fair share. The tax system is smarter now. We’re: Taxing IT and data services like Texas and D.C. do; Raising taxes on cannabis and sports betting, not groceries or medicine; and Letting counties adjust income taxes. The budget also restores critical funding: $122 million for teacher planning $15 million for cancer research $11 million for crime victims $7 million for local business zones, and Continued support for public TV, the arts, and BCCC The budget invests in People with disabilities, with $181 million in services Growing private-sector jobs with $139 million in funding, including $27.5 million for quantum tech, $16 million for the Sunny Day Fund, and $10 million for infrastructure loans. Health care is protected for 1.5 million Marylanders, with $15.6 billion for Medicaid and higher provider pay. Public safety is getting a boost too, with $60 million for victim services, $5.5 million for juvenile services, and $5 million for parole and probation staffing. This budget also tackles climate change with $100 million for clean energy and solar projects, and $200 million in potential ratepayer relief. Public workers get a well-deserved raise, with $200 million in salary increases, including a 1% COLA and ~2.5% raises for union workers. The ultra-wealthy will finally chip in to pay for it: People earning over $750,000 will pay more, Millionaires will pay 6.5%, and Capital gains over $350,000 get a 2% surcharge. Deductions are capped for high earners, but working families can still deduct student loans, medical debt, and donations. This budget is bold, fair, and built to last. That’s why Shore Progress proudly supports it. Click on the arrows below for details in each section.
Show More