Trump’s Project 2025 — What You Need to Know
Jan Plotczyk • July 16, 2024
We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless, if the left allows it to be.
~Kevin Roberts, president of Heritage Foundation and architect of Project 2025
What is this second revolution? Simply, it means "restructuring the country so that the right — meaning primarily straight White men, as was the case 100 years ago — can decide how power and status are allocated.”
~Philip Bump, Washington Post
Don’t be fooled by his recent disavowals. Donald Trump has a transition team working already — mapping out the course of his second administration. The MAGA Trump elite will be prepped for a Trump victory this time.
The plans — or most of them — are not secret; in fact, they’re published on the internet as Project 2025.
Critics of Project 2025 characterize it as an authoritarian, Christian nationalist plan to transform the U.S. into an autocracy. Many legal experts claim it would undermine the rule of law, destroy the separation of powers, end the separation of church and state, and erode civil liberties.
Conceived by the Heritage Foundation (the former conservative think-tank turned far-right ideological tribe), aided by a large cast of former high-level Trump administration appointees and reactionary organizations, and funded to the tune of $22 million by right-wing billionaire megadonors such as the Koch brothers and Leonard Leo, Project 2025 aims to reshape American society completely.
How to accomplish this, as stated in the introduction to the document, is to:
- Restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children
- Dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance to the American people
- Defend our nation’s sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global threats
- Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely — what our Constitution calls ‘the Blessings of Liberty’
These coded dog whistles are crafted to appear innocuous, harmless, and “American,” while signaling their true intent to far-right believers.
As unobjectionable as this language appears, a close reading of the 900-page document reveals some ugly policy plans.
Highlights of Project 2025 include:
Revenge and retribution
- Prosecute Trump’s political opponents
- Pardon and free the Jan. 6 insurrectionists
- Deport protestors
- Jail journalists
- Fire federal civil servants and replace them with Trump loyalists
Expand presidential power
- Concentrate power in Trump’s hands
- Replace government experts with MAGA loyalists
- Withhold congressionally allocated funding at will
- Bring the Department of Justice and FBI under Trump’s power to prosecute his opponents
- Completely dismantle key agencies such as the Department of Education
Rip away reproductive freedom
- Enshrine law that life begins at conception
- Pass a national abortion ban
- Block national protections for IVF (in vitro fertilization)
- Restrict or prevent access to contraception
- Establish surveillance state to track women and health care providers
More handouts to the ultra-wealthy. More taxes on the middle class. Cut Social Security and Medicare
- Terminate ACA (Obamacare)
- Cut funding to Medicaid
- Cut and privatize Social Security and Medicare
- Raise retirement age
- Impose tariffs that would raise taxes on middle class families up to $8300/year
- Extend and expand Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans
Foreign Policy
- End U.S. support for Ukraine
- Curtail foreign aid through USAID
- Start dramatic build-up of nuclear bombs and weapons in excess of treaty limits
- Resume nuclear weapons testing despite international testing bans
- Transition armed forces to a “wartime footing”
More
- Insert principles of Christian Nationalism into the national government
- Reinstate Muslim ban
- Detain illegal immigrants in huge camps
- Eliminate a long list of terms from all laws and federal regulations, including: sexual orientation; diversity, equity, and inclusion; gender equality; abortion; reproductive rights
- Institute policies that support the formation of straight families
- Do away with “woke” propaganda in public schools
- Cripple public education through “school choice”
- Put more guns in schools
- Cut money from school meal programs
- Terminate college loan forgiveness programs
- Eliminate Head Start
- Roll back everything Joe Biden accomplished on climate change
As horrifying as all this is, there’s more — more monstrous stuff that hasn’t been released to the public. Earlier this year, Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, said, “There are parts of the plan that we will not share with the Left: the executive orders, the rules and regulations. Just like a good football team, we don’t want to tip off our playbook to the Left.”
As word of Project 2025 spreads, public outrage has spiked. House Democrats launched a task force to fight back against the agenda. Joe Biden’s reelection campaign published a webpage explaining the contents of the plan. But it’s up to us to spread the word.
Realizing how toxic Project 2025 is, Trump is trying to distance himself from it, simultaneously disavowing knowledge of the plan and claiming to disagree with at least parts of it.
But Trump is mentioned on 190 pages of the 900-page document. Trump’s own super PAC is running ads promoting it and calling it “Trump’s Project 2025.” Trump’s campaign rallies feature many of the policies outlined in the document.
To combat criticism, the Heritage Foundation published “5 Reasons Leftists Hate Project 2025.” In it — and these are quotes — they argue that Project 2025 will:
- Restore the American family. The radical Left hates families.
- Dismantle the deep state. The radical Left needs the deep state to maintain its iron grip on power.
- End America’s border crisis. The radical Left rejects the idea of borders and national sovereignty.
- Reject climate hysteria. Billionaire climate activists use the “climate crisis” as a tool for scaring Americans into giving up their freedom.
- Stop socialism in its tracks. The radical Left hates Project 2025 because it will save America from becoming a socialist nightmare.
The implementation of this blueprint, especially in the context of the newly defined powers of presidential immunity for “official acts,” would spell the end of American life as we know it.
Only the election of Democrats up and down the ballot in November can prevent this dystopian takeover of our country.
The Founders are turning in their graves.
Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.
Common Sense for the Eastern Shore
The Trump administration has moved to revoke the federal permit for US Wind’s offshore wind farm, throwing one of the Eastern Shore’s most significant economic and energy projects into uncertainty. While the legal fight plays out, supporters emphasize what the project means here at home: jobs, lower bills, and new opportunities for the Shore. US Wind’s planned investment of more than $1 billion would ripple through local economies. Thousands of well-paying jobs are tied to construction, operations, and supply chains, with work ranging from skilled trades to steel fabrication. The project’s turbines, located about 10 miles off Ocean City, are designed to generate enough clean energy to power more than 718,000 homes. Advocates argue that it will reduce reliance on fossil fuels, alleviate price pressures on families, and enhance Maryland’s grid reliability. “This project is about jobs, affordability, and securing our energy future,” said Nancy Sopko, US Wind’s vice president of external affairs. She noted that the permits were issued after years of rigorous review and remain legally sound. The Oceantic Network, a Baltimore-based nonprofit representing the offshore wind industry, underscored that the project will also support Maryland’s manufacturing base, pointing to the steel fabrication facility planned for Sparrows Point. “Once completed, the Maryland project and Sparrows Point steel will enhance our national security and economic freedom by directly supporting steel mill investments and bringing back important steel fabrication capabilities to America,” said Sam Salustro, the group’s senior vice president. For Eastern Shore residents, the promise of steady work and lower electricity bills is a rare opportunity in a region often left behind in statewide economic growth. Shore Progress , a grassroots progressive organization, vowed to defend the project: “This fight will be won in the courtroom and in the General Assembly, with strong allies like Governor Moore, Lt. Governor Miller, and the members of the Maryland General Assembly standing with us.” Gov. Wes Moore, who has made clean energy central to his administration’s agenda, has called attempts to cancel the project “utterly shortsighted.” He pointed to the looming demand for new electricity sources and warned that scrapping offshore wind would lead to higher utility rates across the state. Often backed by oil and gas lobbyists and out-of-state tourism groups, opponents argue that the turbines could affect views or local fishing. However, similar claims have been unsuccessful in courts in New York, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island, where projects have proceeded despite high-profile challenges. The Trump administration has tried to block offshore wind several times before, including New York’s Empire Wind and Massachusetts’s Vineyard Wind, but in each case, courts upheld the projects. Supporters believe the same outcome is likely here. For now, the administration has until Sept. 12 to finalize its action. Until then, the future of a project poised to reshape the Shore’s economy and energy future remains tied up in the courts. Jan Plotczyk spent 25 years as a survey and education statistician with the federal government, at the Census Bureau and the National Center for Education Statistics. She retired to Rock Hall.
“For many years, my constituents across the First Congressional District have been overwhelmingly clear: they do not want offshore wind off their coast.” ~ Rep. Andy Harris (MD-01), July 11, 2025 Congressman Andrew P. Harris (R-MD-01) has not accomplished much in his 15 years in Congress, but he has become famous for being Maryland’s regressive anti-offshore wind farm champion — no matter how his constituents feel about it or the benefits that would accrue to them. He has called offshore wind an existential threat to local economies, and claims it poses a risk to national security and will cause great harm to marine life and the environment. And he has consistently maintained that his “constituents across the First Congressional District have been overwhelmingly clear: they do not want offshore wind off their coast.” However, a recent poll of Eastern Shore residents found that There is solid support for offshore wind. Strong majorities are convinced that wind projects will create jobs, improve health conditions, and support American energy independence. The poll found that 51% of Eastern Shore residents support building offshore wind farms off the coast of Maryland; only 37% say they are opposed, and 12% gave no opinion.
Last January 20, President Trump raised his right hand to swear that he’d “preserve, protect, and defend” the United States Constitution. Surprise! He quickly ignored his oath and continues to. Hourly. Upon taking the oath, Trump ordered his minions — guided by the extremist right-wing handbook, “Project 2025” — to carry out an across-the-board assault on the federal government and various private institutions. This assault continues. Millions of American citizens have already been harmed by Trump’s betrayal, and many more millions will be injured until his depredations are stopped. Welcome to the Federal Harm Registry! Initiated and managed by the Maryland Democratic Party, this registry offers an immediate remedy to Trump. Here’s tangible means to fight Trumpism. The Federal Harm Registry is designed to document the myriad adverse effects of Trump’s maladministration! It’s the tool to register every specific harm citizens have experienced or witnessed. Eastern Shore residents, no matter if we are Democrats, Republicans, or Independents, must be active, not passive! Consider: As a college student, have you been denied a Pell grant? Has your family been denied SNAP benefits? As a Shore farmer, is your corn or soybean crop losing its value? As a Shore resident needing medical insurance, have you lost your Medicaid? Have you been harmed by work requirements for Medicaid and food stamps? Has your child’s vaccine become unavailable because of an HHS mandate? As a federal employee, have you been laid off or fired without cause? Have you been terminated from the U.S. military because of your sexual identity? Are Trump’s illegal tariffs forcing you spend more for food and other necessities? Do you know anyone adversely affected by the closure of Head Start for poor children, as well as child welfare, juvenile justice, and youth care programs? The Federal Harm Registry invites Marylanders to document each type of damage to them personally from harmful federal policies under Trump. The registry also offers Marylanders a megaphone to voice their frustrations and fears, and their vision for improving our country. The Federal Harm Registry is a space for Maryland residents to report their personal stories — cuts to health care, higher living costs, job losses, housing problems, civil rights attacks, or any other consequences of this administration’s harmful policies. These reports will document and provide a guide for the eventual reversal of what’s happening in Maryland and in D.C. So, take your first step to report any harm to you by contacting federalharmmd.com ! At federalharmmd.com, you will be able to: Write or record your story; Report any harm you’ve experienced, share an opinion, expose federal malpractices, and advocate for policies that help — not injure — Maryland families; and Help to publicize the Federal Harm Registry by sharing on Facebook, X, or LinkedIn.
When Salisbury Mayor Randy Taylor released a public statement on Aug. 4 following his involvement in a traffic incident with a pedestrian with a walker, he promised “a final report of facts in the next 10 days.” That deadline has now arrived, and city residents are waiting to see if the mayor will follow through on his promise. The Aug. 4 accident marked Taylor’s fourth vehicle-related incident since he took office less than two years ago, fueling public concern about what many describe as a troubling “pattern of recklessness.” In his statement, Taylor described the South Boulevard collision as “minor,” claiming that only the wheel of the pedestrian’s walker struck his vehicle and that the individual refused medical treatment. He emphasized his cooperation with the Maryland State Police investigation and insisted that “all protocols were followed.” But eyewitness testimony and photos circulating online continue to cast doubt on that account. One bystander alleged the mayor struck the pedestrian in the crosswalk and initially drove on “as if he had hit a cone” before returning to the scene. Images shared widely on social media show a shaken pedestrian, supported by his walker, while Taylor inspects his vehicle. The incident has renewed calls for transparency. Residents are demanding to know if mandatory post-accident procedures, including drug and alcohol testing for city employees, were applied to the mayor. “If this were a city worker, they’d be gone by now,” one commenter said. “Why does the mayor get special treatment?” Taylor says he wants to be “forthcoming” with citizens, stressing that the intersection where the accident occurred underscores the “need for continued effort for pedestrian safety.” As of press time, no final report has been released by the Maryland State Police or the Salisbury Police Department. The mayor’s office has not provided updates beyond his initial statement. For many in Salisbury, the delay only deepens frustration. “It’s about trust,” said one resident in a community forum. “Four accidents in two years is not normal. We’re tired of excuses.”
Berlin Mayor Zack Tyndall has announced the formation of an exploratory committee to consider if he should seek the Democratic nomination for Congress in Maryland’s First Congressional District, currently represented by Republican Andrew P. Harris. A two-term mayor and lifelong Eastern Shore resident, Tyndall said his decision reflects recognition of the challenges facing the region and his belief that the Eastern Shore needs a “commonsense Democrat” willing to prioritize solutions over partisan politics. “In a time of growing division and political extremes, it’s clear that Maryland’s First Congressional District needs more than partisan soundbites. It needs solutions,” Tyndall said in a statement on his campaign website, zacktyndall.com. “As mayor, I didn’t wait on Washington to act. I built consensus, cut red tape, and delivered results.” Tyndall pointed to his nearly decade-long tenure in local government, highlighting efforts to balance budgets, improve responsiveness during emergencies, and streamline municipal operations. He described his leadership as “rooted in community, not party.” In a social media post on Aug. 26, Tyndall elaborated on why he is testing the waters for a congressional run. “I have chosen to create a congressional exploratory committee because the people of Maryland’s First Congressional District deserve a representative who is not only visible and accessible but also responsive and a partner,” he wrote. “I believe that I am the person to help bring Eastern Shore values back to Washington.” Tyndall’s exploratory committee will focus on gathering feedback from residents of the district, which includes Harford County as well as the entire Eastern Shore. He said the goal is to determine if there is sufficient support and momentum to mount a competitive challenge to Harris in 2026. While holding the seat since 2011, Harris has faced mounting criticism over his alignment with far-right positions, including his recent vote against releasing the Epstein files. Tyndall acknowledged the uphill climb but said his candidacy would offer voters a new kind of leadership. “This exploratory phase is about one simple question: Can a commonsense Democrat, with deep local roots and a record of getting things done, offer voters a real alternative in 2026?” he said. Residents can provide input on issues and learn more about Tyndall’s background through his campaign website and social media channels .
A local organization, Decency for District One, is increasing pressure on Rep. Andrew P. Harris (R-MD1) for his vote against releasing the full Epstein files, saying constituents deserve answers about why their representative voted against transparency. Since July 24, the group has posted daily content on social media calling Harris to account. Every day, the page highlights his vote and presses the same question: Why did Harris oppose making public documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s network of political and financial connections? “People in the First District deserve honesty,” said a spokesperson for Decency for District One. “When it comes to something as serious as the Epstein files, voting against disclosure raises real questions about judgment and accountability.” The campaign has been visible across Harris’s official Facebook page, where commenters now regularly flood his posts with demands for answers. The pattern has become so consistent that nearly every statement or press release from the congressman is met with renewed questions about the Epstein vote. Despite the growing attention, the major Eastern Shore media outlets have failed to report on Harris’s role in the vote or the backlash that has ensued. Advocates say that silence is part of the problem. “If this were happening anywhere else, the press would be asking hard questions,” the Decency for District One spokesperson said. “Here, it’s being left to everyday residents to raise their voices.” The group plans to continue posting daily until Harris explains his vote. In the meantime, frustration continues to build among constituents who feel ignored. “This isn’t about partisanship,” one supporter commented online. “It’s about whether our congressman believes the public has the right to know the truth.”
