Movie Review: Hope of Escape

Jeanette Sherbondy and Jane Jewell • March 19, 2024


Hope of Escape, based on a true story, is testimony to the hopes and struggles of an enslaved woman who, helped by her two freeborn sisters, embarks on her harrowing journey from slavery to freedom in the years before the American Civil War.

 

Over 175 years later, another set of sisters, descendants of one of the film’s three sisters, has brought the story of their heroic ancestors to the big screen.

 

The movie, by director and writer Amy Gerber, tells the life story of her great-great-great-grandmother, Diana Williams. It begins in 1845 on Rice Hope Plantation near Charleston, S.C., where Diana, still enslaved, has two daughters. Her impending sale means separation; escape is the only way to for them to stay together.

 

Diana and her daughters are promised freedom on the death of their enslaver, but everything changes after he dies unexpectedly. Though her new enslaver frees Diana (but not her daughters), he reminds her, “Don’t get caught!” as freedom for Black people was often not recognized or respected. Intense dialogue such as this reveals the characters’ thoughts and emotions.

 

The first minutes of the film are a succinct summary of what slavery meant for the enslaved. Diana sums it up: “I was never fully protected, nor my daughters.” Constant threats of sexual abuse from the enslaver are not explicit but clearly implied. They are chattel. They can be bought and sold.

 

It’s “always about saying goodbye,” Diana murmurs, referring to the sales, promised emancipation, and attempted escapes, all constants in enslaved peoples’ lives.

 

Diana hopes to find her sisters in the North: Anna in Nantucket in Massachusetts and Julia in New York.

 

Julia Williams was the first wife of Henry Highland Garnet, the well-known abolitionist and native of Chesterville in Kent County, Md., where he was born enslaved. He and his family escaped to New York City when Henry was a boy. (See Common Sense’s article on the women in Henry Highland Garnet’s life here and an article on Garnet’s call for resistance to slavery in 1843 here.)

 

The film shows how Julia and Henry meet when as abolitionists and pioneers in organizing formal education for Black people. They want all Black people to have the opportunity to learn to read and write. Julia says it is important to “Never give up!” The actors speak standard English rather than the dialect of field workers.

 

The film also follows the story of Diana’s daughter, Cornelia, and her sweetheart and future husband, William Benjamin Gould, known as Wilby.

 


In pursuing freedom, literacy was a practical and a symbolic tool. Wilby gives a writing set to Cornelia before she leaves on her dangerous journey North. “Words connected them and gave them their friendship and energy,” Diana says.

 

Education was illegal and risky for the enslaved. Wilby’s mother encourages him to share his gifts with others. He is a talented mason and decorative plasterer, expertise which makes him valuable as an enslaved person. Unlike most other enslaved Black people, Wilby has considerable freedom of movement because of his work. His skills are in demand, and he is often rented out by his enslavers.

 

The dignity and high values of Diana’s family are revealed in incidents during the escape. Despite being legally free, Diana and her daughter are caught and returned to slavery for several years before they finally reach freedom. Diana laments being “stripped of our dignity and beaten down by our sorrow.”

 

The film also shows how Diana and her daughter receive help from strangers as well as friends and families, both Black and White, often at high risk to those who helped hide or transport them. One must admire the gritty and often spontaneous aid Black people give to the escapees as well as the efforts of sympathetic White people who use their social networks to find the money for the enslaved to buy their freedom.

 

Gerber states in an interview that “it ‘took a village’ to fundraise and emancipate a slave. Hope of Escape shows how my own family depended on a complex network of abolitionists, both inside and outside the United States. We see how, even though separated for many years and by thousands of miles, families (both free and enslaved) managed to keep their connections, holding onto hope that their circumstances would change for the better.”

 

This is a film of brave people with hopes of escape. The dialogue has many gems that highlight the philosophy of Diana’s family. The photography is exquisite, and the music is a powerful expression of the enslaved about their condition and their hopes.

 

Hope of Escape offers an alternative to the standard Hollywood ‘slavery film’ genre that usually depicts excessive violence and victimization. This film features enslaved persons with agency, who used their special skills and literacy to plan their emancipation. The film also shines light on the ‘above-ground Underground Railroad’ when slave masters were paid a ‘ransom’ (much like how Frederick Douglass gained freedom) by families in order to free their enslaved relatives.”

~Amy Gerber

 

Filmed in Virginia with local and regional talent, the movie runs an hour and a half.

 

Released in 2024, Hope of Escape has already won several awards, including Best Film at the African Diaspora Film Festival. It was also an award winner at the Broadcast Education Festival of Media Arts. Trailers for the movie are here.

 

Hope of Escape is available on Amazon Prime to rent or buy.

 

 

About the filmmakers:

Director and writer Amy Gerber is associate professor and chair of Film, Gender, and Women’s Studies at Hollins University. She has written and directed many independent films focusing on culture and history. Her films have won awards at numerous film festivals, including the Edinburgh International Film Festival, the Mill Valley Film Festival, and Women in the Director’s Chair, Chicago.



Gerber’s sister, Heidi Gerber-Salins, collaborated with her sister in making the film. Gerber-Salins is assistant professor in the Media, Journalism, and Film Department of the Cathy Hughes School of Communications at Howard University.

 

 

Jeanette E. Sherbondy is a retired anthropology professor from Washington College and has lived here since 1986. In retirement she has been active with the Kent County Historical Society and Sumner Hall, one of the organizers of Legacy Day, and helped get highway /historical markers recognizing Henry Highland Garnet. She published an article on her ethnohistorical research of the free Black village, Morgnec.

 

Jane Jewell is a writer, editor, photographer, and teacher. She has worked in news, publishing, and as the director of a national writer's group. She lives in Chestertown with her husband Peter Heck, a ginger cat named Riley, and a lot of books.

 

Common Sense for the Eastern Shore

By Friends of Megan Outten July 29, 2025
Megan Outten, a lifelong Wicomico County resident and former Salisbury City Councilwoman, officially announced her candidacy recently for Wicomico County Council, District 7. At 33, Outten brings the energy of a new generation combined with a proven record of public service and results-driven leadership. “I’m running because Wicomico deserves better,” Outten said. “Too often, our communities are expected to do more with less. We’re facing underfunded schools, limited economic opportunities, and years of neglected infrastructure. I believe Wicomico deserves leadership that listens, plans ahead, and delivers real, measurable results.” A Record of Action and A Vision for the Future On Salisbury’s City Council, Outten earned a reputation for her proactive, hands-on approach — working directly with residents to close infrastructure gaps, support first responders, and ensure everyday voices were heard. Now she’s bringing that same focus to the County Council, with priorities centered on affordability, public safety, and stronger, more resilient communities. Key Priorities for District 7: Fully fund public schools so every child has the opportunity to succeed. Fix aging infrastructure and county services through proactive investment. Keep Wicomico affordable with smarter planning and pathways to homeownership. Support first responders and safer neighborhoods through better tools, training, and prevention. Expand resources for seniors, youth, and underserved communities. Outten’s platform is rooted in real data and shaped by direct community engagement. With Wicomico now the fastest-growing school system on Maryland’s Eastern Shore — and 85% of students relying on extra resources — she points to the county’s lagging investment as a key area for action. “Strong schools lead to strong jobs, thriving industries, and healthier communities,” Outten said. “Our schools and infrastructure are at a tipping point. We need leadership that stops reacting after things break — and starts investing before they do.” A Commitment to Home and Service Born and raised in Wicomico, Megan Outten sees this campaign as a continuation of her lifelong service to her community. Her vision reflects what she’s hearing from neighbors across the county: a demand for fairness, opportunity, and accountability in local government. “Wicomico is my home; it’s where I grew up, built my life, and where I want to raise my family,” Outten said. “Our county is full of potential. We just need leaders who will listen, work hard, and get things done. That’s what I’ve always done, and that’s exactly what I’ll continue to do on the County Council.” Outten will be meeting with residents across District 7 in the months ahead and unveiling more details of her platform. For more information or to get involved, contact info@meganoutten.com
By John Christie July 29, 2025
Way back in 1935, the Supreme Court determined that independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) do not violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935). Congress provided that the CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, would operate as an independent agency — a multi-member, bipartisan commission whose members serve staggered terms and could be removed only “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office but for no other cause.” Rejecting a claim that the removal restriction interferes with the “executive power,” the Humphrey’s Court held that Congress has the authority to “forbid their [members’] removal except for cause” when creating such “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” bodies. As a result, these agencies have operated as independent agencies for many decades under many different presidencies. Shortly after assuming office in his second term, Donald Trump began to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of several of these agencies. The lower courts determined to reinstate the discharged members pending the ultimate outcome of the litigation, relying on Humphrey’s , resulting in yet another emergency appeal to the Supreme Court by the administration. In the first such case, a majority of the Court allowed President Trump to discharge the Democratic members of the NLRB and the MSPB while the litigation over the legality of the discharges continued. Trump v. Wilcox (May 22, 2025). The majority claimed that they do not now decide whether Humphrey’s should be overruled because “that question is better left for resolution after full briefing and argument.” However, hinting that these agency members have “considerable” executive power and suggesting that “the Government” faces greater “risk of harm” from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty,” the majority gave the President the green light to proceed. Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson, dissented, asserting that Humphrey’s remains good law until overturned and forecloses both the President’s firings and the Court’s decision to award emergency relief.” Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to “overrule or revise existing law.” Moreover, the dissenters contend that the majority’s effort to explain their decision “hardly rises to the occasion.” Maybe by saying that the Commissioners exercise “considerable” executive power, the majority is suggesting that Humphrey’s is no longer good law but if that is what the majority means, then it has foretold a “massive change” in the law and done so on the emergency docket, “with little time, scant briefing, and no argument.” And, the “greater risk of harm” in fact is that Congress provided for these discharged members to serve their full terms, protected from a President’s desire to substitute his political allies. More recently, in the latest shadow docket ruling in the administration’s favor, the same majority of the Court again permitted President Trump to fire, without cause, the Democratic members of another independent agency, this time the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Trump v. Boyle (July 23, 2025). The same three justices dissented, once more objecting to the use of the Court’s emergency docket to destroy the independence of an independent agency as established by Congress. The CPSC, like the NLRB and MSPB, was designed to operate as “a classic independent agency.” In Congress’s view, that structure would better enable the CPSC to achieve its mission — ensuring the safety of consumer products, from toys to appliances — than would a single-party agency under the full control of a single President. “By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress’s choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.” The dissenters also assert that the majority’s sole professed basis for the more recent order in Boyle was its prior order in Wilcox . But in their opinion, Wilcox itself was minimally explained. So, the dissenters claim, the majority rejects the design of Congress for a whole class of agencies by “layering nothing on nothing.” “Next time, though, the majority will have two (if still under-reasoned) orders to cite. Truly, this is ‘turtles all the way down.’” Rapanos v. United States (2006). * ***** *In Rapanos , in a footnote to his plurality opinion, former Supreme Court Justice Scalia explained that this allusion is to a classic story told in different forms and attributed to various authors. His favorite version: An Eastern guru affirms that the earth is supported on the back of a tiger. When asked what supports the tiger, he says it stands upon an elephant; and when asked what supports the elephant, he says it is a giant turtle. When asked, finally, what supports the giant turtle, he is briefly taken aback, but quickly replies "Ah, after that it is turtles all the way down." John Christie was for many years a senior partner in a large Washington, D.C. law firm. He specialized in anti-trust litigation and developed a keen interest in the U.S. Supreme Court about which he lectures and writes.
By Shore Progress, Progessive Maryland, Progressive Harford Co July 15, 2025
Marylanders will not forget this vote.
Protest against Trumpcare, 2017
By Jan Plotczyk July 9, 2025
More than 30,000 of our neighbors in Maryland’s first congressional district will lose their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid because of provisions in the GOP’s heartless tax cut and spending bill passed last week.
Farm in Dorchester Co.
By Michael Chameides, Barn Raiser May 21, 2025
Right now, Congress is working on a fast-track bill that would make historic cuts to basic needs programs in order to finance another round of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.
By Catlin Nchako, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 21, 2025
The House Agriculture Committee recently voted, along party lines, to advance legislation that would cut as much as $300 million from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. SNAP is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, helping more than 41 million people in the U.S. pay for food. With potential cuts this large, it helps to know who benefits from this program in Maryland, and who would lose this assistance. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities compiled data on SNAP beneficiaries by congressional district, cited below, and produced the Maryland state datasheet , shown below. In Maryland, in 2023-24, 1 in 9 people lived in a household with SNAP benefits. In Maryland’s First Congressional District, in 2023-24: Almost 34,000 households used SNAP benefits. Of those households, 43% had at least one senior (over age 60). 29% of SNAP recipients were people of color. 15% were Black, non-Hispanic, higher than 11.8% nationally. 6% were Hispanic (19.4% nationally). There were 24,700 total veterans (ages 18-64). Of those, 2,200 lived in households that used SNAP benefits (9%). The CBPP SNAP datasheet for Maryland is below. See data from all the states and download factsheets here.
Show More